User talk:Polo/Archive 2

Vajstina
Hello, I have made slight changes on page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miloš_Krstić_(footballer,_born_1988), I hope that is enough, if not, Please note — Preceding unsigned comment added byVajstina (talk • contribs) 14:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Good for you, that is enough but please add more as much as possible. Regards, Mediran  talk 09:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

About Winfred Rembert
Hi Mediran. I realise you are keen, but someone whose google hit is a review of an exhibition from the The New York Times is not an A7 candidate.--Shirt58(talk) 02:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Shirt58! Thank you very much for your work on the article Winfred Rembert! Good for you that you did find sources to make the subject a bit significant. Again, thank you and happy editing! Regards, Mediran  talk 02:45, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABS-CBN Philharmonic Orchestra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walang Hanggan(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ Mediran  talk12:58, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Stuha (Czech student movement)
Hello Meridan, pleas let the article Stuha ((Czech student movement) in Wikipedia. This is the more developed version of other edition (by PanDetrich). We sil colaborate togrether. It os no colision, the technical mistake.Sublewin (talk) 18:53, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Seblewin and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I guess that you should have just improved what PanDetrich did in the first place and not to make a new article regarding the same topic and subject. Most of the content of the article is somewhat copied form the earlier version and you just added some illustrations or photographs. As I saw the article just as I logged in, I saw that there is a template, since it is just a proposed merge, it will be long for it to be moved onto another article. As an answer, I cannot decide for what article will be left and decide that your article will stay since in Wikipedia, duplication is not necessary and admins are the one who will take charge on deletion. Please consider to use the Article Wizard on making or starting new articles and pleasebe bold in editing. Again, thank you and Happy Editing!  Mediran  talk 00:09, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Webclient101 (talk) 02:47, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Webclient101 (talk) 03:16, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Webclient101 (talk) 03:41, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Webclient101 (talk) 04:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

speedy a7
Saying a professional athlete plays for a team which is notable enough for a WP articles is an unmistakable assertion of importance. Whether he is notable will depend on the importance of the team, and the other factors at WP:ATHLETE, but A7 does not require notability, just some good faith indication of possible importance.See WP:CSD.  DGG ( talk ) 04:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * thanks for the correction! I will surely understand that! Regards, Mediran  talk 04:24, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Yulian Semyonov bibliography
hi, all the refences etc, only in Russian, currently working on it. please undo your redirect — Precedingunsigned comment added by SwamiJonathan (talk •contribs) 12:18, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello! Your article seems fine but it has no sources. Here in Wikipedia, all articles as much as possible must have atleast one source, better if it came from reliable sources. Please feel free and don't hesitate to undo my revision if you think what I did was wrong. You can undo it yourself if you want. I cannot undo it myself because for me it cannot stand alone. If you are going to revert my revision, please improve the article a bit more. Thank you and Happy Editing! Regards, Mediran  talk 12:28, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Yulian Semyonov bibliography
Thanks a lot! work on it. the changes was initiated by Semenov' daughter. What do you mean by "one reliable source"? almost all the sources in Russian only. am new at wikipedia and just trying to do all by best. thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added bySwamiJonathan (talk • contribs) 13:08, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Good for you that you have added sources, now, you must work on with the lead section, its too short and needs more introduction about the subject. Mediran  talk 13:13, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Miloš Krstić
The standard disambiguation for footballers where the year of birth is necessary is in the from (footballer born xyz) without a comma. Please do not move the page back. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:01, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * As I read this, I saw commas in the format of the proper disambiguation of article titles regarding football. Sorry for that if my move was a little bit wrong because of the unnecessary comma there. But as I saw the article as of now, the disambiguation wasn't there, its good. Thank you and Happy Editing! Regards, Mediran  talk 02:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Indian Engineering Services
1. Indian Engineering Services are civil services that cover defence, power, telecom, public works, roads and railways is not the only area / sector and not at all the suitable category for IES. 2. An article's talk page is meant to discuss about the article and not on the topic such as eligibility for examination. I'm here to improve Wikipedia by making "logical" changes. Hope, you'll support me and all such contributors.

Gamma Sigma Zeta
Im currently working on my page Gamma Sigma Zeta. Having difficulty getting the speedy removal notice removed. I just recently added more significant facts of the organization. What should be my next step ? — Precedingunsigned comment added by Gammasigmazeta (talk •contribs) 03:33, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. The article still lacks a bit of asserting its significance maybe because your info is not cited with reliable sources so that, it couldn't beverified. Please visit or see WP:GROUP also to know something about Wikipedia's notability guideline regarding organizations. Regards, Mediran  talk03:41, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Elizabeth Kemp
Hello - You recently created a page for Elizabeth Kemp and you list her as a friend. Can you tell me how you know her? She asked me to create a wiki entry and I was just wondering how you know her? — Precedingunsigned comment added by DavidDempsey (talk •contribs) 14:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks, but I did't created the article Elizabeth Kemp. And I don't know anything about her. I think you are looking for Big Paul99, the creator of the page you are talking about. Again, thank you and Happy Editing! Mediran talk 02:59, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Aimee Horne
Dear Medrian, Aimee Horne has asked me to remove this page. Please be so kind as to restore my origin edit, or go ahead and delete it all together. Many Thanks. 76.175.155.13 (talk) 19:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)a.syd2009
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I noticed that some anonymous user was trying to delete the article Aimee Horne and I think you are affiliated with him/her. Unfortunately, I don't have the privileges to delete an article and I don't think the article should be deleted at all. Again, thank you and happy editing! Regards, Mediran talk 03:14, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrew Overtoom


A tag has been placed on Andrew Overtoom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bgwhite (talk) 00:32, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Andrew Overtoom. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. You cannot delete speedy deletion from articles you have created. Bgwhite(talk) 04:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Nanoeconomic
Hi Mediran. You reverted my change for Nanoeconomics at. I believe this is a mistake, and an artifact from using your software to detect vandalism. The old article was entirely unsupported by any evidence, pseudoscientific, and rather opaque -- and has been neglected in this way since 2010 -- so I basically reverted to a reasonable state (which happens to be a stub). Please revert back to my stub (or another reasonable stub), or provide a reasoned explanation for why your version should stick. Or I will revert back to my change.
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. Thank you for the clarification you made. I think you should make an account because you contribute well enough! Again, thank you and happy editing! Regards, Mediran talk 12:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Powerball2012
Hello Mediran, this is my second day and I have a lot to learn, thanks for the heads up, and have a great day. Powerball2012 13:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added byPowerball2012 (talk • contribs)


 * Good for you! Please stay here on Wikipedia and continue to edit and create good article. Please visit WP:HELP orHelp:Contents/Getting started to help you out on getting started or simply consult me here on my talk page. Again, thank you too and happy editing! Regards, Mediran  talk13:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Permission to move files granted
I have granted file mover rights to your account following either a request for those rights or a clear need for the ability to move files. For information on the file mover rights and under what circumstances it is okay to move files, see File mover. If you do not want file mover rights anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Dianna (talk) 23:21, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Regards, Mediran  talk23:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Anna Bagriana
Hi! Unfortunately I don't edit English Wiki and I can't understand the rules correctly. Which references should be here? I think that in this article there are enough references, because she is famous Ukrainian modern writer. If it's not enough information please help us to find necessary information. I think that the only problem here that the references are not in English. –– uk:Користувач:visem — Preceding unsigned comment added by194.44.34.100 (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, the article does not cite any sources. I nominated it forproposed deletion due to WP:BLPPROD, all biographical articles created after March 2010 must have at least onereliable source, if it has no any reliable sources, it may be deleted in a week or will be nominated for Articles for Deletion. Please visit or see WP:BLPPROD or WP:BIO for more info regarding these issues. Please visit also WP:CITE,Help:Footnotes or WP:CITEFOOT to help you out on citing sources because as far as I can see, the articles doesn't have any footnotes. References from other languages are fine but better if it is in English. Thank you and happy editing! Regards, Mediran talk 13:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Hipped roof
Hello, either you (personally) or your bot reverted my edit, stating my editing was "identified as test/vandalism". If you had actually followed the link you would have seen that my edit better reflects the definition in the article. Reference to "conical" and "Russian" in the original is therefore misleading. Additionally, if you read the talk page, you might have noticed that the whole disambiguation was under question — ideally the page should be a redirect to hip roof. Very trivial (talk) 13:45, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello! Thank you for your change but your revision is copied in the article Tented roof, yes, it better reflects but it is not necessary. Sorry for identifying your edit as vandalism, I should made it good faith revert. If you want, please feel free and don't hesitate to undo or revert my revision onto your last revision. Again, thank you and happy editing! Regards, Mediran talk 23:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

survivor series 2006
The way it was worded originally was awkward. I feel that my changes were worded better.

EUscreen
Hi Meridan. I have declined the speedy deletion of EUscreen as I don't think the article is spammy enough and because it appears to be on a notable subject. If you still think it should be deleted, please take it to WP:AFD. SmartSE (talk) 20:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Good for you that you have declined the speedy. If the article will not improve, I guess I will nominate it for deletion. Thank you and happy editing! Mediran  talk 23:39, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Unogarcia
can i ask you a question sir, why did you deleted my Tropical Depression 01W(2012) and Tropical Depression 01W(2011) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unogarcia (talk • contribs) 04:14, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Unogarcia and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions, it was really appreciated. Unfortunately, I didn't deleted your article because I don't have the privileges to do that. Your article wasn't deleted, it was justredirected onto another article which is 2012 Pacific typhoon season. I know you are wondering why the article was redirected, according to Jason Rees, the one who redirected the article, he redirected it with an edit summary of "WP:Bold There is no need for Tropical depression 01W to have an article". That's all I know about your question. But I didn't do anything on your article except of moving. Thank you and have a nice day ahead! Regards, Mediran  talk 04:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

ok you dd not delete it but why did you moved it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unogarcia (talk • contribs) 05:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Moving articles is no harm done, it is just renaming an article if there is some typo, wrong spacing, etc. As far as I can remember, you created your article with "Tropical Depression 01W(2012)", see the spacing? "01W" and "(2012)" have no space in between, so that I moved it, after moving it, it became "Tropical Depression 01W (2012)". "Moving" is also called as "Renaming". Thank you! Regards, Mediran talk 05:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

but what is the violation i did in creating an article why did they save my same article but different titles User:Unogarcia/Tropical depression 01w(2012) and they deleted Tropical depression 01W(2012) the only difference is the User:Unogarcia

Zomb
Fair enough, do you want me to restore? As far as I can see, this upcoming film has no chance of passing the notability criteria, but I've put it back if you think it's worth it  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:43, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I don't want you to put it back because it really fails some policies here like WP:NFILM and WP:CRYSTAL. Also, it is an unremarkable upcoming film, on the discussion on AFD, most of the votes are delete so it will be deleted anyway. Thank you Jimfbleak and have a nice day! Regards, Mediran  talk05:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I've actually done now what I should have done before replying above, and re-read the deleted text. I'd assumed this was a YouTube-type production, and therefore eligible as web content anyway. Thanks,   Jimfbleak -    talk to me?  05:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think so, because if that film is somewhat a YouTube production, I've rather tagged it with speedy in the first place than nominating it for deletion. As I searched it on Google, I saw no results, even on IMDb so I guess it is not a web content. But it was deleted, so fair enough. Thanks and have a nice day! Mediran  talk 06:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited My Life with Morrissey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Watson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ Mediran  talk09:47, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Unogarcia2
but why did my article disappear? is there any violation i did in that article? — Precedingunsigned comment added by Unogarcia (talk •contribs) 10:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

but what is te violation of my article that makes it disappear? — Precedingunsigned comment added by Unogarcia (talk •contribs) 10:07, 27 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello again Unogarcia! Please leave a message regarding the same topic on the same section where we last discussed. Your article disappeared because it doesn't assert its notability to have an article. As what the user who redirected your page said, "WP:Bold There is no need for Tropical depression 01W to have an article", means it is not a notable phenomena or a notable geographical event/happening. Your article really didn't violated something, it just have no notability. Please readWP:EVENTS, WP:GEOSCOPE, WP:EFFECT for more info regarding the notability of these topics. Thank you! Mediran  talk 10:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Constructive
lol "constructive" i was just saying there also use vinyl  — Preceding unsignedcomment added by Inv1805 (talk • contribs) 02:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Please click the "New Section" or "+" tab at the upper right section of the page whenever you are going to leave a new note or message. Your revision appeared to be really un"constructive" and is identified as vandalism. Please refrain from adding texts at the end of a page. You may visit or see WP:EDIT to know more about Wikipedia's policies regarding editing. Thank you and happy editing! Regards, Mediran  talk 02:57, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

about the 2000 german gp
i believe everyone would agree with me that Rubens' win in Hockenheim 2000 was very emotional. he had mechanical problems in qualifying, forcing him to start 18th. in the race he made brilliant overtakes to get to 3rd, and then took the desicion to stay on the dry tyres when it started to rain. he waited 123 races to take his first victory, even though everyone recognized his talent. it was also the first brazilian win since the late Ayrton Senna's last in Adelaide 93 and it is well known how emotional brazilian people get about their country. he burst into tears on the podium. i just added the word "emotional" for people that didnt watch the race, to know exactly what happened. i believe my arguments are more than enough. i didnt want to vandalize the page and i am objective. you decide. i would like the word emotional on the page, please. i will not edit again because i dont want any trouble. its up to you. farewell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by5.55.59.201 (talk) 12:41, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions, they are really appreciated. For me, in my own point of view, not all contents must be so detailed on what exactly had happened. If you think your edit was right, please do so, feel free and don't hesitate to undo my revision. Thank you and happy editing! Regards, Mediran  talk 09:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Christopher Gordon (composer)
Thanks Mediran - have added a range of references. Artsmusicfilmedits (talk) 15:41, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * You're most welcome and thank you too. Keep it up! Cheers! Mediran  talk 09:48, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

A9
Hi, Mediran! Just wanted to let you know that I've declined your speedy deletion nomination of Open Sky (Discography). Though the title is misleading, it appears to actually be about the band and not just one of their works, so A9 doesn't really qualify. I'm not even convinced it would qualify for A7; the award nominations for the one album could be enough to stave that off, too, as it's a pretty low bar to meet. Thanks, though! Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 15:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Writ Keeper! First of all, congratulations for your recent adminship! I recently noticed that the article was already deleted byJohnCD with A9. I think it was the correct tag due to the article is the list of musical recordings and the article of the band or the musician is not existing. Well, first I was really thinking what would be the right CSD tag to be inserted and after that, I came up with A9. But it was already deleted. Thank you! Regards, Mediran  talk 09:53, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse Welcome
Welcome to the teahouse! Thanks for volunteering to help with this evolving project. Please readthis, our guidelines for host conduct. Thanks again, and feel free to let me know if you have any questions, as I am the current Maitre d'. Thanks again, Go   Phightins  ! 22:48, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you Go Phightins! I will surely read that and thanks for the suggestion. Regards, Mediran  talk 09:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Probable partial contribution in one of your pages
At "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Common_Evolved_Stage", section "Design" it is written

"[...] While ACES can start with existing Centaur and Delta pneumatic, avionics and propulsion systems it is intended to transition to lower-cost and higher capability systems founded on our Integrated Vehicle Fluids (IVF) system concept. [...]"

The use of 'our' in the description hints to the fact that this content must have been pasted from some sort of internal memo or PR paper.

Therefore the partiality if this section is questionable.

Is there a way to discuss and check this ? —Precedingunsigned comment added by 188.130.104.42 (talk) 10:19, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I reverted your revision due to it is unconstructive and looks like avandalism. Don't post something questioning and negative. If you think you see something wrong and looks inappropriate, please do so to improve it collaboratively and it will be appreciated. I will do something about it if I can and thank you for your concern. Thank you and happy editing! Regards, Mediran  talk 10:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Jerusha Jhirad - your BLPPROD
(a) She's dead, and (b) she's sourced, to a book. References to not have to be online. Please take more care before slapping tags onto articles. Thanks. Pam D  11:18, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello PamD! Thanks for your concern and sorry for that. I was really confused then. Anyways, thanks! Mediran  talk 11:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism?!
i was wondering why you marked my edit on unsigned comment added by Wookieehero (talk •contribs) 01:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. Thank you for reverting and removing irrelevant contexts in the article. Even removing spam links. Some IP did put the content of an actress with spam on the page and it is (as of now) already removed. I guess I was not myself or sleepy at that time. Sorry for the mistake I've done and also thank you for your concern. Again, thank you and happy editing! Regards, Mediran  talk 08:45, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

why there is no information about "the cape scott story" by lester peterson
i want to know about the video which is been uploaded to youtube about a photofraph, does it have any sense — Preceding unsigned comment added by182.71.123.82 (talk) 11:09, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello! I don't know about th YouTube video you are referring to. The article "The cape scott story" was previously deleted due to it violates WP:COPYVIO from copying contexts from http://www.aaronmueller.com/CapeScott2004/history.htm. Mediran  talk 11:14, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Giovanni Domenico Cassini
Meridian our change was not an act of "vandalism", Cassini was born in Perinaldo, a small village in the Liguria region, not to Imperia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perinaldo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Cassini

Thanks for your attention and will hopefully be correct the inaccuracy — Precedingunsigned comment added by 151.60.218.185 (talk) 21:08, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your cooperation on editing and improving Wikipedia collaboratively. Thank you for your concern. I don't know much about his birthplace, I searched it on Google and found some info regarding that. Sorry for reverting your once good revision. Again, thank you and we would appreciate if you liked the place and decide to stay. Regards, Mediran  talk 06:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

oh sorry :)
im sorry, but i make edits sometimes. with my mom or dads permission and if i ever get an edit wrong you can always delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by George da man 123 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello! Good for you! Just refrain from doing that again in the future time. You can also visit WP:EDIT for more info regarding Wikipedia's editing policy. Thank you and happy editing! Regards, Mediran  talk 06:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Sara Takatsuki
The BLPPROD you place on Ms. Takatsuki's article should never have been placed. The requirement is no references whatsoever to be in the article for a BLPPROD to be added. The article contained two references. Bgwhite (talk) 06:46, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Bgwhite! Thank you for that! Sorry again for my mistake. Have a Nice Day! Regards, Mediran  t 10:10, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Dolan meme not relevant
Hello!

I deleted the Dolan meme section as it don't have anything to do with Donald Duck and his universe. Also I don't think that you should add meme's to pages - I mean if you do you should add all memes that is somehow related to a character like the Spider-Man memes or the horrible "get out Bart I'm piss" meme on Lisa Simpson's page. I don't think you should do that. But if it's really necessary to have the Dolan thing, can't you just create a new page for that?

And to add - yes, I do hate the Dolan meme as I think it really undermines the amazing legacy Donald Duck has but I'm trying to be reasonable about this change and hope you would reconsider this. Thanks! — Precedingunsigned comment added by 92.32.219.43 (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you think the section have no relevance to the subject, it may be removed but as of now, it may be not because there is no enough reasons presented on why the section should be removed. I noticed that you continually removing the section for 3 times without presenting any reasons through your edit summary or through the article's talk page. Please add edit summaries or discuss it on its talk page on why it should be removed. But for me, it has relevance. Thank you and happy editing! Mediran  t 13:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * PS I cannot create a separate article for Dolan because the character is not really notable, it is just fine for it to be a part of the article. Mediran  t 14:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * But if it isn't really notable, why put it there in the first place? I don't think you should just add anything on the pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaius Matius (talk • contribs) 14:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * It is needed for it to be there for more scope of info for the subject, but unfortunately, as I logged in, I noticed that you have already removed the section. Dolan is just a "parody" meaning it is like cultural reference or the subject's impact to the Internet community. Another is when I am talking about its notability is that it cannot have its own article for it is not a stand alone subject. But you already removed it, I guess it's OK now. Thanks though! Mediran  t 23:32, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * PS I saw the article's talk page and there is already a discussion regarding this topic, most of them are saying to remove the section, also its notability is very questionable, good thing that you removed the section. Mediran  t 23:40, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the understanding! And I suppose I should continue this on the Donald Duck Talk page but I just noticed the section is back on because of Vacation9 used STiki on my latest removal, so I'm wondering if you could remove the section because of your credibility as a page patroler. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaius Matius (talk • contribs) 00:57, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * ✔️ Mediran  t 01:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

ASIO artcle
Mediran, the article on ASIO actually reads that 'Reed conducted an inquiry into Wake's performance as a security officer and found that he was competent and totally innocent of the charges laid by the Army's commander-in-chief' however there is no previous mention or description of these charges and the use of the word 'totally innocent' instead o simply 'innocent' is obvious bias. From a legal perspective one cannot be totally innocent, merely innocent or guilty. — Precedingunsigned comment added by 115.70.91.247 (talk) 11:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, I reverted your revision due to it has an unnecessary "(what charges?)" there. You should have just changed the bias statement there to "innocent" instead of "totally innocent". Thank you for your concern and have a nice day! Mediran  talk 03:48, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * PS I already changed the "totally innocent" to as simply as "innocent". Mediran  talk 03:51, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Seth macfarlane
I belive it cost $49,999.99

For him to make his pilot so there u go mot 50000$ — Precedingunsigned comment added by 24.52.254.110 (talk) 21:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * LOL. That is just nonsense. Mediran  talk 03:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

updates to Bobby Clampett's widipedia site
I tried to make some important updates to Bobby Clampett's wikipedia site regarding his family, where he lives, his Impact Zone contributions, his golf courses he has designed, etc but it got rejected for some reason. Also, the controversy about Liang-Wen-Chong has many inaccuracies in it and should be removed. He was not let go because of these comments. R. Daniel Clampett — Preceding unsigned comment added byBClampett (talk • contribs) 11:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, you blanked the section without explaining why. It would be helpful if you will addedit summaries for other contributors know why you remove certain contents. Another is that if you want to remove a section, please discuss it through the article's talk page. Thank you and happy editing! Mediran  talk 11:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Mohan Babu

 * Hello Mediran, I would like to let you know that Mr. Mohan Babu is well known for his straightforward approach. His straightforward approach made him unique in the Tollywood film industry. You better know about him or you should ask people of Andhra about him before deleting a true content.Thanks! EshwarRaaja (talk) 13:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello EshwarRaaja and thanks for your contributions. Unfortunately, I don't know what's "He is a straightforward." there. There are many "straightforward" you know. Ahh... I don't think what you added is significant. If you think your revision was correct, please feel free to revert my revision and please add sources. Thanks though! Mediran  talk 13:52, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Climax movie
I assumed this was a web only film, but I see that I was wrong. I did a search (not as bad as you would think given the title), and it is an obvious copyright violation either from  or more likely from one of the Malayalam film sites. I'll restore and redelete under that heading if you think it's worth doing so Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  15:42, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * It's OK, you should not restore and re-delete it since it is already deleted. But, if it was a taken from other sites, why didn't you deleted it with G12 since you have found sources that matched the contexts of the article? Mediran  talk 07:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Adam Young
Hello!

Glad to see you're taking Wikipedia very seriously - the world needs people like you. However, I'd like to contest your recent edit to the Adam Young page, namely removing "Flames Pond" and "Rick" from the also-known-as section. While these names may not be mainstream monikers of Mr. Young, they, particularly Flames Pond, are names he has gone by.

Flames Pond is the name of a video series ( he made with several of his friends when he was 14, which have since been uploaded to YouTube. Having it on Mr. Young's Wikipedia page makes it easier for fans, such as me, who have been confused by other fans' use of the name "Flames Pond", to understand its usage.

"Rick" is something of a running joke between Mr. Young and his fans, as frequently, during Twitter Q&A sessions, something such as the following will occur: https://twitter.com/owlcity/status/264082754289934339 From your page I've gathered that you are a Spongebob Squarepants fan, and so probably understand the reference.

Again, no hard feelings, and I really appreciate that you are so diligent in maintaining Wikipedia. I intend to go and add references for these names.

Thank you for your time!

Fleckeye (also, I apologize for not being logged on when making this edit or leaving this message.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.140.93.127(talk) 21:31, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you so much for contesting such edits I made but unfortunately, your edit seems unconstructed well. I don't know about "Flames Pond", I didn't not really removed that, what I remove is your phrase saying ", and not definitely Rick" where I think, in my own perspectives violatesWP:NPOV. You should have just removed the "Rick" alias then explained it in your edit summary on why "Rick" should not be there. I appreciate your concern and thank you too. Happy editing! Mediran  talk 08:56, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling
ATTENTION! HOLD IT! NOTE THIS PLEASE: 6 minutes is far to fast  for tagging  any  page for A1 or A3. Please read the instructions at WP:NPP and WP:DELETION, and if you  need any  advice don't  hesitate to  ask  me on my  talk  page. Happy editing! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:05, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry for that. I will make sure to wait for about 10 to 15 minutes if the page has potential to be undeleted. Mediran  talk 10:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Please be more careful
There was no personal attack to prompt warning. It can easily confuse a new editor when they are warned improperly.  Tide  rolls  11:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * It's just that in my own point of view that the editor looks attacking the other editor and making the article his. Sorry for that warning and I will surely be more careful regarding these things. Regards, Mediran  talk 10:19, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Personal Attacks
what do you suggest i do when another user engages in personal attacks on me?? Superfast1111 (talk) 14:07, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

thanks for your work on the vile parle station page. Superfast1111 (talk) 10:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * You should have just be cool, relax, unwind and don't mind attacks because it will cool off soon. Just do as simply as staying cool when the editing gets hot and please assume good faith. Mediran  talk 10:26, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Just to point out, User:Abhishek191288 hasn't indulged in Personal attacks. User:Superfast1111 has undone multiple of his edits leavingmind your own business & stay away Abhishek191288 as an edit summary. I see this as a reverse situation.--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:13, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The user is just asking on what he can do if he has been engaged on an edit war/attacks/harassment or if someone will attack him. Thanks though! Mediran  talk to me! 08:57, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure. Thanks for your opinion. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:03, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Jab Tak Hai Jaan Reverts
The edits you reverted as nonconstructive were actually vandalism and abuse. The man wrote in Hindi, "go suck my **** you ********". Is there any way to ban that IP address? That is just ridiculous. No one should be able to do that. We have to block this guy.Ashermadan (talk) 19:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I really don't know what IP vandalizing the page, I guess it was 182.187.85.38 but this IP only edited twice, as the IP edits more unconstructive that already constitute vandalism, the user may be blocked. But I saw the page and it was already protected, it will now prevent some IPs from editing it negatively. Thank you! Mediran  talk 10:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * PS If you think the editor really commits an action of vandalism because I don't know what is the exact IP, you could report it onWP:AIV. Mediran  talk10:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Anil Film Director listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anil Film Director. Since you had some involvement with the Anil Film Director redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). -- Patchy1 01:25, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bratanna95 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

This is not a newsletter
This is just a tribute.

Anyway. You're getting this note because you've participated in discussion and/or asked for updates to either the Article Feedback Tool or Page Curation. This isn't about either of those things, I'm afraid ;p. We've recently started working on yet another project: Echo, a notifications system to augment the watchlist. There's not much information at the moment, because we're still working out the scope and the concepts, but if you're interested in further updates you can sign up here.

In addition, we'll be holding an office hours session at 21:00 UTC on Wednesday, 14 November in #wikimedia-office - hope to see you all there :). I appreciate it's an annoying time for non-Europeans: if you're interested in chatting about the project but can't make it, give me a shout and I can set up another session if there's enough interest in one particular timezone or a skype call if there isn't. Thanks!Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

I need help with the Sanic page
There seems to be a swarm of IP vandals there, and I am worried about 3RR. I am not confident in reverting another time. Where can we report this? --Sue Rangell &#91; citation needed &#93; 01:15, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Sue Rangell! That's really a big problem I've also encounter a while. I guess we should report them on a sysop and block them for 24 hours. I don't know what intervention you should report such edit warring but is this applicable on reporting it on WP:AIV? Mediran talk to me! 01:23, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * PS Good thing that the article was already been deleted by Bongwarrior and it has creation protection now. Mediran talk to me! 01:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

I think we all did a really good job here. Thanks for the barnstar!! :) --Sue Rangell &#91; citation needed &#93; 01:39, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Ohh...... you're welcome and thank you too! Mediran  talk to me! 01:42, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
Hello Mediran, I'm trying to create the translated page of "Fabio Sonzogni", an italian theatre director, but it's the second time you delete it. If you check the Italian and French version of this page you can verify the importance of an English translation. Thank you and good work. --GraceE (talk) 14:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)GraceE
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your concern but your article was deleted due to it has no significance asserted on the article itself and it fails WP:BIO. I surely suggest you should use a draft where you can have time on constructing your article. Because when an article is poorly translated or in other language with incoherent thought, it may be deleted but if you make it on a draft, you can take your time on making it without any disturbance by others. You can also use theArticle Wizard. Thank you and have a nice day! Regards, Mediran  talk to me!00:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Dance Central 3
I think you made a mistake. The stuff at the end is not related to Dance Central 3 whatsoever. Those were all tracklists from other games that someone else put. And,nothing was confirmed to be DLC except for Gangnam Style & Call Me Maybe. There will be One Direction,Justin Bieber & LMFAO but the songs haven't been announced whatsoever. Also,the difficulties and other stuff also hasn't been confirmed with the exception of what decade the song was made.

It seems that someone else has fixed all that stuff again. --70.131.96.160 (talk) 02:10, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to improve Wikipedia collaboratively. Good job for you, sorry for the revision I've done due to you didn't presented any edit summary, edit summaries are helpful for other editors because it can present on what changes you have made on a certain article. Please read or visit WP:ES for more info. Again, thank you and happy editing! Regards, Mediran  talk to me! 02:17, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Its okay. And sorry about not putting an edit summary. I do that a lot but I just didn't feel like really putting one that time. Again,sorry about not putting a summary on the edits. --70.131.96.160 (talk) 02:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Lancaster Steiner School
Hey, I noticed you undid my redirect of this article which had been sitting unreferenced for over three years. If you think it is worth keeping, can you find some sources and add them? I don't think it is viable as it stood, which is why I redirected it.--MarchOrDie (talk) 10:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello! I know you are new here so welcome here on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, you're recent edit on redirecting a page about a school on another article has a problem. Please present consensus or discuss it on the article's talk page on why should be the page redirected. Please wait for the response of others if you are going to conduct a discussion. Thank you and happy editing! Mediran talk to me! 10:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply. Wouldn't the onus be on you to show consensus that the article is worth keeping? Some sources would help, as I said. --MarchOrDie (talk) 10:16, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Articles about schools doesn't really needs lots of sources. Schools are somewhat considered notable. Please readAll high schools can be notable, or WPSCH/AG. If you think that schools is really really non-notable, please do so to revert my revision in good faith. Mediran  talk to me!10:21, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

memorizing
as an educationer i wrote it as simply as possible benefiting from my experiments,knowledge.my basic way was seeing % 83 audıo and vocal way %11 smelling %3.5 touching %1.5 tasting &1  .these are the rates of effects of senses ın learnıng somethıng. so read my post again. ı dont have any info about you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halil ibrahim tüzüner (talk • contribs) 11:02, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Halil ibrahim tüzüner! Thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, your revision fails Wikipedia's policy regarding neutral point of view. Also, it looks like an original research which is discouraged as what is written on WP:ORIGINAL. Please improve you're revision and add sources, better if it isreliable. Thank you and have a nice day! :) Mediran  talk to me!11:10, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

thanks for replying but unfortunately you had better improve your writing skill. — Precedingunsigned comment added by Halil ibrahim tüzüner (talk • contribs) 14:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Identifying edits as test/vandalism using STiki
Hi. Please don't identify content disputes as test/vandalism as you did with --Jahalive(talk) 22:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Jahalive! Unfortunately, writing "and convicted rapist" might sound too harsh and not appropriate in the lead section. I should have chose the Good faith revert option. My bad. Thank though! :) Mediran  talk to me! 10:49, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Good work, Mediran

 * Thanks And Adoil Descended! Well appreciated! Have a nice day! :) Mediran  talk to me!23:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Hey, Mediran!
Hey! I posted on the talk page for my speddy deletion article. You might want to check it out before I lose my restrictions page for my talk. That's just some 411. 'Bye now! Bacon-Cheddar Man 5000 (talk) 00:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Bacon-Cheddar! I know you are new here so welcome to Wikipedia! An admin already replied on your talk page. Mediran  talk to me! 00:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

And why you reverted my editing on Governments Talk Page ?
Please explain--Burham (talk) 01:28, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello fellow Wikipedia and welcome! Sorry for that, watta big mistake, I didn't noticed that the page was a Talk. It will not ever happen again. I guess I was sleepy. Thanks though for your urgent concern! :) Mediran  talk to me!01:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! I have a request on you? Since I am in HOT conversation with opponent I would like ask you to revert you mistake. Just I do not want give the opponent any arguments I am aggressive. OK?--Burham (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't completely understood your request but I see that you already have a warning because of edit warring. What I can only say is just do as simply staying cool when the editing gets hot and please assume good faith. You may also rephrase your request for me to understand that. Thanks. Mediran  talk to me!02:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!--Burham (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did withTemple Hauptfleisch. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a botabout, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  02:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Temple Hauptfleisch
I don't know if Speedy CSD G7 is applicable if it's in the middle of an AfD in which someone voted to Keep. Articles for deletion/Temple Hauptfleisch. However, I would not contest a Speedy Deletion, should anyone mention it. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 02:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, on its AFD, someone want it to be kept but the author of the article substantially blanked the page, in accordance to G7, it is possible for it to be deleted in the said criterion. Mediran  talk to me!02:44, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * G7 doesn't explicitly mention AfD, but seems very strange for someone to basically hijack consensus of an AfD by blanking the page. I don't care in this case, but procedurally I think it is wrong to use G7 in the middle of an AfD. It steps on the feet of the people involved in the AfD (at least, those who voted Keep). The spirit of G7 is that it could only be done if no one's feet are being stepped on. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 02:55, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Wait.... what I mean with G7 is that it is applicable once the article was blanked by the author. Mediran  talk to me! 02:58, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I've opened discussion here to clarify point of procedure. --Green Cardamom (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Great! Hope that other users respond... Mediran  talk to me! 03:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Discussion about your User Page
Hey, how did you design your user page? My question is how you did that? I am asking you because I liked your user page design and I also want to design my user page like yours.--pratyya (talk) 06:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello! Most of the design were taken from User:Elockid and some at User:Jimfbleak and I modified for my personal likes. Thank you and have a nice day! :) Mediran  talk to me! 09:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mount Snake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

New page patrol tools
I moved the page "paul heroux" to be properly capitalized Paul Heroux. Which ever reviewing tool you are using thinks that I am the page creator (understandable). I changed the page back to a redirect. Yakatz (talk) 04:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, thank you! Thanks though! Mediran  talk to me! 04:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

SHEC Energy deletion you proposed
Please do not delete SHEC ENergy page.

They are a serious company with over 1200 shareholders. The have received money in grants from SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CANADA and have a potential to help the world stop global warming, — Preceding unsignedcomment added by Wikizorba (talk • contribs) 06:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Your article was already deleted under G11 due to it fails to assert its significance and it is also advertising in its own way. Advertising in Wikipedia is extremely discouraged and not tolerated. Please consider to use the Article Wizard on creating new articles or use could also create a draft. Have a nice day! :) Mediran  talk to me!09:17, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank You...
Thanks for the Barn star..Something like this is always encouraging to involve more in Wikipedia.. KAS ( talk ) 12:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * You're most welcome! Have a nice day! :) Mediran  talk to me! 02:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

 * You're very welcome! Have a nice day! :) Mediran  talk to me! 04:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Mailybayev Baglan
I wouldn't worry about it too much, there is little edit history to save. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:41, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * True, but it is against Wikipedia policies regarding Moves. :) Mediran  talk to me!09:49, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Baglan Mailybayev
why you reverted my editing ???! I just wanted to write in English - name then surname which is Baglan is a name Mailybayev is a surname! Could you please change it back?? Baglan Mailybayev - name surname! the content of the text in Russian and Kazakh is the same! I just wanted to change the order in English name then surname! Help me please! Thanks a lot in advance! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kz astana (talk •contribs) 16:12, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I already sent you a message regarding this issue. I already sent a request for move yesterday as I said on your talk page. Here's a link to the discussion, just click this. The reason why I reverted your "cut and paste" move is due to Wikipedia has a strict policy regarding such moves. Doing "cut and paste" moves can split the article'sPH|page history. As what is said in WP:CUT, "cut and paste" move is highly undesirable, because we need to keep the history with the content for copyright reasons. If you want to move/rename a page, just click the "Move" tab at the upper-right section of your Wikipedia page. Please see WP:MOVE, WP:PAGE, WP:CUT and WP:COPYRIGHT for more detailed info. Thank you and have a nice day! :) Mediran  talk to me! 09:01, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Hello Poorsoft! I know you are a newcomer here so Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for this, much appreciated. Of course I don't think low on you because you are just new here and you are starting and absorbing new things and facts that can make you a well competent editor. Thank you and have a nice day! :) Mediran  talk to me! 09:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Reply of your objection !
Hello Sir, I am doing with good faith. but you have rise objection. Why........ i know Tulasipur, Lakuri....

Rajeeb — Preceding unsigned comment added by49.244.173.186 (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Your additions need verifiable reliable sources.  —  Jeff G. ツ  (talk)   03:09, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Please provide sources as what Jeff G. has said. However, your additions seems unneeded and unnecessary. Thanks though. Mediran talk to me! 03:11, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Dice versus Dies
Mediran, you reverted my edits on Multiple patterning. The correct plural for 'die' in the context of chip manufacturing is 'dies,' not 'dice.' 'Dice' always refers to gambling tools not to silicon chip manufacturing. 98.237.3.34(talk) 03:07, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello! When we say "Die" it may refer to a person who "deceased" and the other is "Die" which means a gambling tool and the also for the chip manufacturing. Mediran  talk to me! 03:15, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * PS My bad, you really are right. See Die (manufacturing) and Die. Mediran  talk to me!03:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Changing G3 to A7
Since the page did qualify under G3, why change it to A7? It is obviously a hoax but if it was not a hoax, the animal could have had significance since it could have been owned by the institution, asserting some importance. Vacation nine 04:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Not because if it doesn't have any results in any search engines like Google, Bing, Yahoo! or any others and it doesn't assert significance is that it may be a hoax. For an instance for an example that there is an ordinary man who wants to create an article about his pet parrot, we can tag the article for deletion as A7 and not G3, that is also the scenario happened in that article. Remeber that not all institutions are notable that there can be also a page in the Internet talking about their animal. Thank you. :) Mediran talk to me! 04:26, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * But the article asserted importance about the parrot. The asserted information just wasn't true. Vacation nine 04:38, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There is already a clue/hint that an ordinary man meaning a commoner who created the article, that implies that the parrot is also not notable. OK, another example I will give, for an example is that I am an ordinary man that created an article about my cat but the truth is that I don't have any, that could be a hoax but us here in Wikipedia will never know if that cat really exists, so that, the only way is A7. By the way, the article was already deleted as A7 here. Thank you! :) Mediran  talk to me!04:44, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Look at the A7 criteria: "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines." This was true with the article. I don't think it qualified under A7 since it made a credible claim to significance (of course not true) that wasn't supported by a source. Thus, it qualified under G3. Vacation nine 04:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The dog itself does not assert its significance in the first place, it doesn't claim notability either. It just say that the dog was owned by an institutions, that's it. For an example, the president of a notable company wrote an article about his guinea pig, even if the owner is notable, the notability to the pet was not inherited. Please visit or see WP:A7 and WP:A7M. Thank you. Mediran talk to me! 04:58, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Can we just end this saying it could have applied to both criteria equally as a compromise? Vacation nine 05:00, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I guess not, why? It is not because we cannot say G3 as A7, it will contradict to each other. We cannot prove that a hoax is real, ironic right? The name already suggests that it is a hoax and it is not real, if it not real, we cannot tag it for A7 because it applies only to "real individuals (person, animal), organisations and web content. Mediran  talk to me!11:38, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you saying G3 would be correct in this case and not A7? Vacation nine 15:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No, Vacation9 suggests that if the article could be tag with multiple reasons such as G3 and WP:A7. Mediran talk to me! 14:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * What I meant was actually that the article could have been tagged with both, but not at the same time. I mean that the article could have fit under either criteria. Vacation nine 15:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I had already presented some instances on why G3 couldn't be applied, except if there is a fact or report that there is factual errors regarding the topic. Thank you. :) Mediran  talk to me! 00:17, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright, maybe A7 would apply more, since it is a direct qualification under A7. But I believe G3 could have applied also, hence the reason I tagged it as such. Can we end this now? Vacation nine 00:25, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations from STiki!

 * Thank you for this, well appreciated! Your tool is really working out in fighting vandalism, such a big help! Mediran  talk to me! 00:24, 25 November 2012 (UTC)