User talk:PolyGlot

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karm a  fist  20:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JavaPro Magazine concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JavaPro Magazine, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JavaPro Magazine


Hello PolyGlot. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "JavaPro Magazine".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

July 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nerd, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your blog is not a reliable source.  General Ization  Talk   11:45, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Reliable source of WHAT? The only claim of substance that it makes is that there is a number of possible spellings, and it provides an actual list of a number of possible spellings! That list is raw data which is its own "truth-maker" (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-identity/) Someone might not agree with any particular entry in the list, BUT YOU CANT ARGUE WITH THE FACT THAT THE LIST (and indeed that whole blog post) EXISTS! Rather than a mindless knee-jerk application of an abstract rule like "blogs are not a reliable source", take the time to do the job right before arrogating the power to yourself to revert changes! (and we wont even get into it being humor in the first place, and therefore get a life if this is your idea of being a guardian of the night's watch).

2017 Tour de France
Thanks for adding the reference for Sagan to the 2017 Tour article. But next time, please do it in a normal way. --EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 20:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)