User talk:PooH16

Welcome!
Hello, PooH16, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Adam Kalinowski, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GSK ✉ ✓ 18:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam Kalinowski


A tag has been placed on Adam Kalinowski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GSK ✉ ✓ 18:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Edit summary needed
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Frze > talk  07:53, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

'Use Preview button
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to   Adam Kalinowski , it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. -- Frze > talk  07:53, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Adam Kalinowski
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Adam Kalinowski, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.adamkalinowski.com/recenzje/living%20sculpture.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Adam Kalinowski and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Adam Kalinowski, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Adam Kalinowski with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Adam Kalinowski. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Adam Kalinowski saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:46, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I have also flagged copyright concerns with the image File:Shelf with holes 1988, Adam Kalinowski.jpg. While we are able to use limited non-free images of artworks, they must be used for the purposes of sourced discussion about the artwork itself - not simply the artist. Unless this concern is addressed by correcting any shortcomings in the non-free use rationale, to show how the image fits with our non-free content policy and guideline, the image will be deleted after Friday, 7 February 2014. If you'd like to discuss this matter here or on the talk page of the image, you're welcome to do so. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:53, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Your restoration of publication of the article above has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the processes described above for verifying this. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you restore this content again without first following the processes for verifying license, it will be necessary to prevent this account from editing. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I can't tell you exactly what's wrong with the article - it's been flagged for several issues - but copyright issues arise when text that is published elsewhere is published on Wikipedia without verified license. In this case, the article duplicates substantial text from an essay by Marianna Konarska published here. We need verification of license to use Konarska's text from her - the processes are described above. Without that permission, the article needs to be rewritten in the temporary space described above to remove all text copied from or closely paraphrased from her paper.


 * The article cannot be restored as it is unless license is verified. Once the copyright concerns are addressed, other concerns with the article (whatever they are) may then be addressed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

PooH16 (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC) Ok, I see. Thank you for explanation.

Update
In the absence of permission, this content has now been removed. Odds are good that most of it would have been removed anyway, as it does not suit our internal policies and guidelines.

Just to be sure that we are clear, let me explain that Wikipedia is not a personal webhost where people may write what they wish about themselves or subjects of interest to them. There are a lot of rules about what we can say in our articles. Wikipedia is a a collaborative online encyclopedia which is intended to summarize neutrally in due weight what reliable sources say about notable subjects. Our three core content policies are Neutral point of view, Verifiability and No original research, but there are many, many other guidelines to help us create a unified look and feel.

Another thing that newcomers here find very unusual, the people who write articles here do not "own" them - that is, you cannot control what happens with content once you place it on Wikipedia. By clicking save page, you agree to the Terms of Use of the website, which includes allowing other editors to change your material. There are things you can do if their changes do not conform to our policies, but they have as much a right to write this article as you do. (See WP:Own.)

Given that this subject is all you have ever worked on, it seems pretty obvious that you have a personal interest in it. Given that, you should read COI and make sure that you comply with the requirements there in your work related to this artist. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

PooH16 (talk) 15:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC) It is really hard for me to understand why the Text's describing an artist work can not be included in a page? If they actually describe a piece of work or relating to the pictures shown? Text I have used has been published in a art magazine. And also why pictures of works can not be related to the places or institutions which held them ? What do you mean by personal interest? I will be editing it furthermore because I am not happy for how it looks like now. In future I will send you permissions from authors of the texts being used.


 * First, the copyright problem - the content was published before. We don't have permission of the author/publisher to publish it. Second, what is appropriate for an art magazine is not necessarily appropriate for us. We do not serve the same purpose as an art magazine - we are not here to analyze art or provide subjective responses to it. It is fine for us to quote what art magazine say about creative works, but even that we have do in proportion.


 * The pictures of works can be related to the places and institutions that have held them, but the external links are inappropriate and the way they had been scattered is not in accord with our manual of style. They have been put into a gallery section with a brief descriptor for each.


 * I mean by personal interest that it is obvious that either you are the artist or are connected with him in some way. Because of this, you may have a "conflict of interest" - you may not be neutral on the subject of the artist, for instance, which is required. You may also wish to add information to the article that you know to be true, and we cannot do this - if it isn't supported in a reliable, published source, we can't use it. Please read the conflict of interest guideline and ensure that you follow it.


 * As long as you follow the rules set out there and in other policies, you are welcome to edit the article, but, again, I must remind that you do not have any more rights to this article than any other editor on Wikipedia. Content on our website belongs to Wikipedia, not to us as individuals. It must accord with the policies and guidelines here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PARK of COLOURED SAND, Warsaw, Poland 2009.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PARK of COLOURED SAND, Warsaw, Poland 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)