User talk:Poofdragon

May 2016
Hello, I'm CorbieVreccan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jim Morrison, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:IRS for how to identify reliable sources that are suitable for this. -  Co rb ie V    ☊ ☼ 15:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

CorbieVreccan. I did provide a reliable source on Mary Werbelow. It was not discussed prior altho it was just deleted by you and I undid: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jim_Morrison&diff=next&oldid=721009584

It is fact that she was a serious girlfriend and a simple search of Mary Werbelow and Jim Morrision will show this information exists in over 8 books.

https://books.google.com/books?id=HjPcWkEPSR8C&pg=PT194&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEIOzAF#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=4cuVn1VUBMEC&pg=PT106&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEILjAD#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=4cuVn1VUBMEC&pg=PT106&dq=mary+werbelow+jim+morrison&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7wp-28ufMAhUCET4KHd6mCiAQ6AEIKDAC#v=onepage&q=mary%20werbelow%20jim%20morrison&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=XtxLBAAAQBAJ&pg=PP14&dq=mary+werbelow+jim+morrison&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7wp-28ufMAhUCET4KHd6mCiAQ6AEIIjAB#v=onepage&q=mary%20werbelow%20jim%20morrison&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=_oRdvoEOoXMC&pg=PA34&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://madameask.com/2014/10/06/interview-with-paul-ferrara-doors-photographer/ Poofdragon (talk) 05:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jim Morrison, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Bare urls to fanzines are insufficient. '' - Co rb ie V    ☊ ☼ 22:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jim Morrison. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Take. It. To. The. Talk. Page. And seek consensus. Stop edit warring. '' - Co rb ie V    ☊ ☼ 22:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. - Co rb ie V    ☊ ☼ 23:08, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

CorbieVreccan. I did provide a reliable source on Mary Werbelow. It was not discussed prior altho it was just deleted by you and I undid: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jim_Morrison&diff=next&oldid=721009584

It is fact that she was a serious girlfriend and a simple search of Mary Werbelow and Jim Morrision will show this information exists in over 8 books.

https://books.google.com/books?id=HjPcWkEPSR8C&pg=PT194&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEIOzAF#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=4cuVn1VUBMEC&pg=PT106&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEILjAD#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=4cuVn1VUBMEC&pg=PT106&dq=mary+werbelow+jim+morrison&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7wp-28ufMAhUCET4KHd6mCiAQ6AEIKDAC#v=onepage&q=mary%20werbelow%20jim%20morrison&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=XtxLBAAAQBAJ&pg=PP14&dq=mary+werbelow+jim+morrison&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7wp-28ufMAhUCET4KHd6mCiAQ6AEIIjAB#v=onepage&q=mary%20werbelow%20jim%20morrison&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=_oRdvoEOoXMC&pg=PA34&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://madameask.com/2014/10/06/interview-with-paul-ferrara-doors-photographer/

Poofdragon (talk) 05:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 20 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Jim Morrison page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=721306729 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F721306729%7CJim Morrison%5D%5D Ask for help])

{PoofDragon|reason= I don't have multiple accounts. This is my only active account and I am hardly active here. Why is my account blocked? Someone reverted all my sourced edits. Poofdragon (talk) 02:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)}.

June 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * If not you, who is ? ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Ask them. Again, this is my only account. What did I do wrong? How do I appeal this? Poofdragon (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2018 (UTC)  Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)