User talk:Poojanthebeast

March 2021
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Bald and Bankrupt. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nemov (talk) 13:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

BLPCRIME is not applicable as Benjamin Rich is a public figure (see WP:PUBLICFIGURE). "If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it."

The section is properly referenced and sourced from a newspaper which has been in circulation since 1988 and had an online version since 1998.

Bald and Bankrupt
Please do not ignore direction as you did with Bald and Bankrupt. Your edit violates WP:BLPCRIME. This topic has been discussed before on the talk page. Please find a consensus before making further changes. - Nemov (talk) 22:56, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

BLPCRIME is not applicable as Benjamin Rich is a public figure (see WP:PUBLICFIGURE). "If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it."

The section is properly referenced and sourced from a newspaper which has been in circulation since 1988 and had an online version since 1998.
 * Even if you agree he's a public figure (that's on shaky ground), this 20 year article isn't relevant to his YouTube channel and far from being "well documented" since there's no notable coverage establishing that this is the same person. It's clear we're at an impasse. Please find a consensus on the talk page before making further changes. - Nemov (talk) 13:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Please see WP:PLEASEDISCUSS - "Neither an editor or a group of editors who watch an article and contribute regularly nor the creator of an article own an article and have the right to "approve" or "disapprove" of any edits to the article before they are made. The WP:Be bold editing guideline actually encourages editors to boldly make changes. It doesn't say "Propose your edits on the talk page and seek approval first"."
 * Your post violates basic guidelines that have already been discussed on the Bald and Bankrupt talk page. I disagree with your edit. Since we're at an impasse, find support for your change on talk. Further edit warring is a violation of Wiki policies. Thanks! - Nemov (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Nemov (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Warned for edit warring at Bald and Bankrupt
Hello Poojanthebeast. You've been warned for edit warring per the result of a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You are risking a block if you revert the article again before getting a consensus in your favor on the article talk page. You need reliable sources to show that this Benjamin Rich-Swift is the same as the Benjamin Rich who operates the Bald and Bankrupt Youtube channel. EdJohnston (talk) 18:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Poojanthebeast. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The SandDoctor Talk 17:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)