User talk:Pookeo9

Archives: User:Pookeo9/Archive_1, User:Pookeo9/Archive_2

Speedy deletion nomination of New Userboxes
A tag has been placed on New Userboxes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fbifriday (talk) 22:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

RfD of Assassin's Creed III
Hello, you recently participated in an AfD for Assassin's Creed III which closed as "speedy redirect". I have created a redirect discussion to gain consensus on whether a redirect is suitable at the time, or whether it would be better to remain as a red link until more concrete information is available. Please feel free to contribute here: RfD. Hope this helps, --Taelus (talk) 14:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Hoodywood Records
Hello Pookeo9, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Hoodywood Records - a page you tagged - because: Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. JohnCD (talk) 21:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:CSD is very narrowly drawn: it is only for pages "consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history" - stuff like "4bnf*6%8@##3h5m" or "Yaaaaaaayyyyy!!!!" Stuff where there is a recognisable meaning but it doesn't seem sensible can sometimes by caught under WP:CSD blatant misinformation or hoax; but even that won't do for this article because one actually has to do some checking to be sure it isn't true. There is good advice on speedy tagging from an experienced admin at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for that, I will try and not make the same mistake again.-- Pookeo9 Talk If you need anything  21:34, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Same goes for Functional temporalism, which I have declined to speedy. As it has been WP:PRODed in the past, the only avenue left if you want it deleted is articles for deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Robert Pavlovic
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Robert Pavlovic. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alumni F.C.
Hi, can I please ask why you took this article to AfD when the PROD notice was still in place...? Regards, GiantSnowman 19:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, that's great, thanks for the explanation! :) GiantSnowman 20:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Attacks in the article Canadian Tenors
Please do not make personal attacks&#32;as you did at Canadian Tenors. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  23:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Two articles for deletion gave no reason
Both Amy Black and Le Disko were closed speedy keep, because you did not provide a reason for the AFD. You must provide a reason for nominating the AFD. Ikip (talk) 03:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

PROD for Reşadiye shooting
The article shows clear notability, you didn't even really give a real reason to delete the article-- Coasttocoast (talk) 22:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

What...
What on earth was Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Current events all about? Please remember that competence is required to edit... NW ( Talk ) 22:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * If you are in a position where your computer might be shared by multiple people, then you need to make sure that you log out, when needed, or you lock the interface of the computer. Next time, people might not be as forgiving. It's your responsibility to keep your account secure. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 23:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Warning regarding logging out and vandalising
I find it curious that an anonymous user from your IP address, who appears to be using your computer, would decide to start vandalising high-profile user pages. The user pages that this user chose to blank suggest knowledge of Wikipedia, so please don't try to fob it on someone else, especially since they appeared to be using your computer. You also felt the need to warn this person for vandalism, so you obviously knew about it.

Either way, know this: If an anonymous user continues to vandalise pages from your IP, I'll it to stop it. This means two things. Firstly, you won't be able to edit, not even while logged in. Secondly, no other administrator would be allowed to undo the block, so you'd stay blocked for whatever duration I feel is appropriate. So, regardless of whether or not it was you, it'd be in your best interests to make sure it doesn't happen again. --Deskana (talk) 23:43, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. --Deskana (talk) 00:21, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Ngc7822b.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ngc7822b.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:04, 8 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 06:04, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

RfA thankspam


Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Pavlovic
A tag has been placed on Robert Pavlovic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 14:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Pookeo9! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Robert Pavlovic -

August 2010
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Deaths in 2010, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  — Soap  —  13:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

AFD of Response to the 2010 Copiapó mining accident
hey, I saw you tried to start an AFD for Response to the 2010 Copiapó mining accident with twinkle. Apparently something went wrong, so a nonexisting AFD discussion page was added to the AFD log. I have removed it and suggest you try again if you want to nominate the page for deletion. Yoenit (talk) 15:14, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Jupiter proposal
Hello! Would you be interested in forming WikiProject Jupiter? If so, please show your support by clicking on the link above!-- Novus Orator 04:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Space reorganization
Hello WikiProject Space member! A discussion has been started regarding the future of WikiProject Space here; any comments you might have would be welcome! There are mainly two competing ideas:


 * 1) Centralize all the Space-related WikiProjects, such as Astronomy and Spaceflight, and merge them into WikiProject Space, or
 * 2) Separate the Astronomy and Spaceflight "sides" of WikiProject, and remove WikiProject Space.

If you can think of other options, that's great too. Your contribution to the discussion would be much appreciated. Thanks! :)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Space at 00:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC).

October 2013
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at WWE Battleground, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. EvergreenFir (talk) 01:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

June 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ruby Rose. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   02:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ruby Rose, you may be blocked from editing. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   02:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Green Bay Packers WikiProject
Hi Pookeo9! I just wanted to let you know that I have restarted the Green Bay Packers WikiProject. Come check out the page and if you are still interested, add yourself to the active member list! All of our articles have been assessed and there are a lot of new tools available to help us improve Green Bay Packers articles. Please feel free to post on the WikiProject's talk page or on my talk page if you have any questions! Thanks, « Gonzo fan2007   (talk)  @  14:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2009 Peshawar judicial complex bombing


The article 2009 Peshawar judicial complex bombing has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)