User talk:Poonerstambayan

August 2012
Hello, I'm Blakegripling ph. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Richard Poon seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Blake Gripling (talk) 03:47, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: Richard Poon
Yes, I understand, but since you mentioned that you're working closely with Richard, that would constitute conflict of interest. You may still write on the article, but as per guideline you may not use any subjective wording or add honorific titles to it. Dolphy being called the King of Comedy on his article is fine, since there is sufficient and adequately-sourced material to back it up, but not on Richard's article, at least for now. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:46, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Hello, Poonerstambayan. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Richard Poon, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ''I already warned you not to add any essay-like or subjective content to the article. I'll report you to AIV if you continue to do so.'' Blake Gripling (talk) 08:08, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Richard Poon.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Richard Poon.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:56, 31 October 2013 (UTC)