User talk:Popecreator

Welcome!
welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions or place   on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. SatuSuro 09:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Aus-NZ or NZ-Aus
"Why should Australia always go first?" is a compelling question. One answer is that it usually goes first in things like ANZAC, ANZCERTA, Aus-NZ Food Authority, SANZAR, and everywhere that the distinction can be made on List of Australia-New Zealand-related articles. Australia shouldn't always go first. It should only go first in published names and agreements such as the examples already given. Otherwise New Zealand can go first, or Australia. Being first named is being first thought of, but not being more important because neither is more important in the explanation of this subject matter. It wasn't an Australian who first successfully made it to the top of the world's highest mountain, it was a New Zealander and a Nepali working together. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Popecreator (talk • contribs) 06:48, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

this was raised a short time a go the preference should be in all cases to follow alpabetical precedence in all cases where there is no clear distinction e.g. mount everast new zealand should go first, this allows for simplicity and reduces the potential for edit wars where ppl keep moving back and forth based on ideological grounds.

for reference i am australian

Digmores (talk) 08:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

oh one question are u avenue

Digmores (talk) 08:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

I am not avenue and I am Australasian

sorry if u felt accused i can see from ur additions that u are contributing, welcome to wikipedia :)

Digmores (talk) 05:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC)