User talk:Popepaulvi

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Popepaulvi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

The information provided on the entry is from the Cistercian Order of the Holy Cross and from the Court of Appeals in the State of North Carolina. If you need additional PDFs I can post those as well. There is nothing manufactured or inaccurate.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 11:55, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, I've cut the Cistercian Order of the Holy Cross to a stub that seems neutral to me. I would really appreciate it if both you and the Abbot could try and write neutrally on this  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers 23:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I think that is reasonable. The Abbot could provide information on the positive efforts that the Order. I think that is a step in the right direction to moving the overall image of the organization in a better light. I am all for edits that add to the history and identity so long as the past is not revised to fit an image that is not sustainable. Thank you for your efforts and I look forward to your comments or thoughts in the future. Popepaulvi.
 * Thanks, however I have a little difficulty with your sources. in particular I don't see any mention of him being defrocked and the allegations were from 2002 - by now either hes been found guilty or not.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers 23:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for those last two edits. I'm logging off now good night.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers 23:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, there's a deletion debate at Articles for deletion/Cistercian Order of the Holy Cross to decide whether the order has generated sufficient media coverage to justify an article here. If you have access to things like newspaper articles which mention the order you might want to raise it there.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers 16:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)