User talk:Popfranci

January 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Syro-Malabar Catholic Major Archeparchy of Ernakulam–Angamaly have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Syro-Malabar Catholic Major Archeparchy of Ernakulam–Angamaly was changed by Popfranci (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853229 on 2022-01-24T18:03:16+00:00

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Syro-Malabar Catholic Major Archeparchy of Ernakulam–Angamaly, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Edit summaries
You'll get much farther with this type of edit if you add an edit summary to explain why you are removing the material. I agree with its removal, but without an explanation, others are likely to automatically revert it. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm confused. This user removed a whole bunch of stuff from the article, and replaced it with "an article deleted". I don't see how that would be constructive. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:17, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Admittedly the edit was clumsy, but the removed material (other than the "See also" section) needed to be removed. A bunch of quotations of Canon Law and Papal missives to try to claim that the Eparchy was schismatic, where there are no reliable sources to back such a claim. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah ok. Thank you for clarifying. I had looked at the edit and didn't see anything wrong with the content that was removed so I reverted them because not only did I think the information shouldn't have been removed but they also replaced it with "an article deleted". ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Understood! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)