User talk:Popmusickid

Welcome!

Hello, Popmusickid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment&#32;with the page Kerli discography. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. --220.101.28.25 (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kerli discography. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --220.101.28.25 (talk) 15:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.--220.101.28.25 (talk) 15:19, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Kerli discography. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Italic text —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.28.25 (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Hold your horses for a second here
Hey, I'm sorry I've had to revert a lot of your edits, but most of them are really questionable. Genres are usually a touchy subject and everyone has their own opinion, so, in general, you can't go changing genres at random without an explanation/source/beforehand discussion. ×××BrightBlackHeaven(talk)××× 15:33, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I'll go along with ×××BrightBlackHeaven(talk)××× here, depending on your editing from now on. Please read some of the links on the 'Welcome' I left you above. Editors are encouraged to be BOLD in editing, but CONCENSUS with other editors, VERIFIABILITY of information, and Neutral Point of View are required of all editors. EDIT WARRING and 3RR violations are not things you want to do. Regards --220.101.28.25 (talk) 16:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Kerli, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. ×××BrightBlackHeaven(talk)××× 18:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


 * No, seriously. Stop doing that. Changing genres is definitely not minor. ×××BrightBlackHeaven(talk)××× 18:53, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Do you speak English? I'm going to revert all your non-minor "minor" edits, so you might as well stop now. ×××BrightBlackHeaven(talk)××× 18:56, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Goth-Pop music
A tag has been placed on Goth-Pop music, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WWGB (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Fragile (Kerli song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend that you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 13:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing music genres, as you did to Love Is Dead (song), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Continued genre changes to suit your own point of view may result in a block. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 13:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue,as you did at Tea Party (song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- WikHead (talk) 02:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
As per the above, you have been warned previously about changing music genres without discussion, and I see from your edits that you have again been changing the genres of music without discussion. Consider this your only warning; if you continue to change genres without discussion, You may be Blocked from editing. Thank you. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)