User talk:Poppitangtang

Your recent edit of Narcotics Anonymous
thank you so much for taking down what I wrote...unfortunately what I wrote is true and there are many other places to show the truth, I just thought it would be ok here. Humility has nothing to do with it, however control issues seem to be taking place. I guess I have lived through too much in my time in the fellowship.
 * In the future, please do your best to exercise spiritual principles when editing Wikipedia, such as humility. Following the editing guidlines, such as citing sources and refraining from first person opinions, is useful as well. J-Dog (talk) 19:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I didn't take anything down that you wrote. As you can plainly see, my user name and the user name of whomever reverted what you entered clearly do not match, so perhaps you need to redirect your grievance towards the person responsible. As far as what you wrote, weather it is true or not has nothing to do with it. Either you can cite it or you can't. And if you can't, it has no place here. It has nothing to do with control issues, it has to do with the guidlines of this site that we are all held to, including myself. Lastly, the point of my original message to you was one that I would think would not be necessary, seeing as you've lived through so much in your time in the fellowship. The point was, if you are aware of your place in the world, there is no need to make a scene of yourself by painting your opinion with broad strokes all over the main page of NA for all the world to see. Perhaps you need to revisit a step AND tradition meeting with greater regularity. The fellowship that I know doesn't believe in airng dirty laundry in a public forum. Just trying to clear up any misunderstandings you may have had; it seems that you had a few. J-Dog (talk) 04:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)