User talk:Popscenealrightt

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. StarryNightSky11 (talk) (cont)   00:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

PD
What is your problem? You vandalise pages for no reason, I see you have had a warning already so probably won’t be long before you get another. You are correct, I don’t own the page at all but I contributed a lot to it ( the original text wasn’t written by you either ). You have contributed nothing. Why not go and make your own page and you can edit as much as you like ! You would probably enjoy that, you are good at editing. —- Smelly.Spaniel (talk) 03:30, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Your recent editing history at Paul Draper (musician) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''It looks like you are engaged in a content dispute with another user; neither one of you is vandalizing. You need to discuss the situation at the talk page and reach consensus, even if that means reaching out for a third opinion.'' —C.Fred (talk) 04:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)