User talk:Porkchopzilla

June 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Historicity of Jesus—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:17, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Historicity of Jesus. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:20, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

How is it vandalism when it can be proven? Porkchopzilla (talk) 07:22, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Your editing the truth Porkchopzilla (talk) 07:22, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

You dont think people have the right to know the person they worship is an Egyptian story that been translated to the point on be incomprehensible? Porkchopzilla (talk) 07:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Watch zeitgeist if your confused. The whole origin of jesus is nothing more than a story of the sun coming back for villagers in egypt Porkchopzilla (talk) 07:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Historicity of Jesus, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 07:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)


 * @Porkchopzilla: I removed some of your comments because that's not how Wikipedia operates. You need reliable sources if you want to add significant content. Please find another way to express dissatisfaction as we try to collaborate here. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)