User talk:Pornranger

I'm recopying the thread with my response to your discussion page, since I imagine you might see it more easily here.

Armistice on the Deepthroat Page
Dear mBlume. I couldn't find your shingle and this is the only talk page I could find regarding the Deepthroat page, please feel free to remove this after you have read it. I respect your Wikipedian work, but I disagree with your decimation of the Deepthroat (Sexual Act Page). That page not only talks about the sexual act, but the history of the act in media over decades and the performers who have that talent, which is relevant to the topic and should therefore be permitted. If you would like to create an additional page on the subject to house that information, that would be a fair compromise. Other than that, I will continue to defend the right of that page to exist. Please let it be. - pornranger 29 April 2008
 * Thank you - that was precisely the first action I took - in fact I'm pretty sure that the page I created - Deep throat in pornographic film still exists, though others removed links to it from the Deep throat page long ago. I also made a couple posts to the Deep throat talk page, and they are still the last two on the page - neither has been replied to:
 * 
 * 
 * I may be acting from ignorance here - if deep throat is predominantly a feature of pornographic film, and is not a technique commonly practiced upon actual men by actual women, then perhaps its article should be primarily a review of its artistic usage.
 * However, if it is first and foremost a sexual act (which is what the title of the article seems to imply) then it seems to me that an exploration of its use in film, especially one with this much detail, could be reserved for its own article. In any case, thank you for making the effort to discuss this with me, rather than simply reverting.  You will see that I have left the page alone pending the result of this discussion.
 * -MBlume (talk) 08:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)