User talk:Portphillippublishing

Spam in Dan Denning
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dan Denning, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dan Denning is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dan Denning, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:50, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Agora Publishing spam on Wikipedia
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.


 * Domains:






 * Accounts:


 * Deleted articles:
 * Stansberry & Associates
 * Steve Sjuggerud deleted twice
 * DailyWealth deleted twice
 * Tom Dyson deleted twice
 * Stansberry deleted 4 times
 * Mark Whistler deleted twice
 * Addison Wiggin deleted twice
 * Articles for deletion/Addison Wiggin
 * The Daily Reckoning deleted twice
 * Graham Summers
 * Dailywealth

-- A. B. (talk • contribs) 22:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Other articles:
 * Bill Bonner (author)
 * MoneyWeek
 * Dan Denning
 * The Bull Hunter

Speedy deletion nomination of The Bull Hunter


A tag has been placed on The Bull Hunter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)