User talk:Portsmouth&Southsea

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Mjroots (talk) 08:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

ANI discussion
I'm sorry to have to do this to a new editor, but an issue about your editing has been raised at the administrators' notice board. Please do not worry too much about this. I've already made my feelings clear about the raising of the ANI and no doubt other admins will agree. I very much doubt that any administrative action will be taken against you in this case. Please feel free to comment on the ANI discussion. Mjroots (talk) 08:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Removal of tags
This is to advise you that you are required to improve articles before removing maintenance tags. I have reverted three of your edits where you have removed a required tag without making any attempt to address the concerns about the article. If you persist in this behaviour you may be blocked from using the site. I suggest you read WP:MOS and study the guidelines applicable to each of the tags you are removing. Remember that tags are placed by experienced editors who understand both site standards and tag usage. Given that you are supposed to be a new editor, you cannot have that level of experience or understanding of the site standards. In addition, your edit of Rufus Sewell introduced an unreferenced statement that expressed a personal point of view, thereby breaching one of the site's central tenets as explained in WP:NPOV. That edit has also been reverted. You should also read WP:Verifiability. Jack | talk page 05:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

ANI
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 21:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Barts
Hi. I'm not sure I understand your point about freedom of speech, but I do feel that the lead paragraph is too short, and needs adding to, so I've replaced the tag. Please feel free to discuss it on the article's Talk page. Cheers DBaK (talk) 08:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Port of Hamburg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Can you please stop removing problem tags from articles, the tags your are removing should stay. Note, I have just gone through your edits, and reverted the removal of problem tags. I am not alone here, as quite a few other editors have also reverted your tag removals. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 23:22, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * As per above users I have reverted your tag removal from Benenden School, 3 references for an article is not really acceptable for the tag removal. There are whole sections of the article with no references for example the section "Notable alumnae" contains about 25 entries - for the tag removal I would expect at least 20 references to be supplied for these. If you wish the tag to be removed then you need to put in the effort and improve the article first. Thanks Keith D (talk) 23:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hackley School, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Also the BLP of Vilayanur S. Ramachandran should not have had its templates removed. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 20:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to History of Czechoslovakia, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Iohannes Animosus (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)