User talk:Porvabor

Welcome!
Hello, Porvabor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Porvabor, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

{unblock-spamun|Radouane El Hajali|I promise now I know how to create an article without a problem and now I know the rules of Wikipedia about how to write an article and I will never do something like what I do I sorry again.}

Speedy deletion of User:Porvabor


Your user page, User:Porvabor, has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be advertising which only promoted or publicized someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 331dot (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

{unblock-spamun|Radouane El Hajali|I promise now I know how to create an article without a problem and now I know the rules of Wikipedia about how to write an article and I will never do something like what I do I sorry again.}

July 2020
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 12:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Multiple unblock requests
You have three open unblock requests. That's abusive. Which single unblock request would you like us to review? Remember, WP:CIR applies. If you keep multiple unblock requests open, that is grounds for keeping you blocked. --Yamla (talk) 09:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

The last one, sorry Porvabor (talk) 09:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You still haven't explained why your edits were inappropriate and you still haven't told us what you plan to write about instead, now that you know you won't be unblocked to write about Porvabor Health or anything else for which you have a conflict of interest. --Yamla (talk) 09:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

I have experience about health aarticles, so I'll written aarticles about health and I'll never remained Porvabor health I want to be just a Wikipedia writer 🙂. Porvabor (talk) 09:53, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * No; you have a clear and direct conflict of interest in that subject area. --Yamla (talk) 09:59, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

so what you want for me to do, written about subject I have no idea about it or what, I say now I know how to write article without problem for Wikipedia so let me try and see what I publishing Porvabor (talk) 10:05, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I expect you to abide by WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. You haven't been doing so thus far, nor have you indicated how you plan to abide by these in the future. This is the end, I will not respond further. Another admin will be along shortly to review your open unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 10:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.