User talk:Poshbakerloo

A tag has been placed on Alex Truswell, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MER-C 13:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Fallibroome High School
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Harris 07:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Wimbledon & North line
I've added the "prod" template to the article Wimbledon & North Line, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Wimbledon & North Line. You may remove the dated prod template, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Harris 22:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC).

AfD Nomination: Wimbledon & North Line
I've nominated the article Wimbledon & North Line for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Wimbledon & North Line satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Wimbledon & North Line. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Wimbledon & North Line during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. --Harris 23:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Harlesdon Towers and Embankment tower
You have recently created the above two articles, which I cannot find any evidence to support. In light of the unverified material you previously introduced in the Wimbledon & North line page, I suspect these might not be real towers - certainly I can't find anything on google. So, I'd ask you to introduce some source for your details, otherwise I'll send both pages for deletion.

As the standard warning template goes:
 * Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.

--Harris 23:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

The above articles were already created and deleted in November. Therefore:

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)