User talk:Positive force

November 2013
Hello, I'm Ramaksoud2000. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kentlake High School without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 02:59, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kentlake High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kentlake High School was changed by Positive force (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960892 on 2013-11-15T03:13:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:13, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kentlake High School, you may be blocked from editing. Sam Sailor Sing 03:38, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Kentlake High School. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Sam Sailor Sing 03:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC)