User talk:PossiblyPetrus

January 2020
Hello, I'm Eagles247. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mitch Petrus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  22:05, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Mitch Petrus. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

I’m not sure why y’all are deleting my edits, but it is factual information. I provided a website for reference. Please leave my boyfriends wiki alone once my 24hr block is over and I add it back PossiblyPetrus (talk) 19:08, 7 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The content is being removed for two reasons; first, no reliable source has been provided to allow readers to verify the statement as is required by Wikipedia policy. Second, even if the required sources were included, Wikipedia does not include the names of family members and associates who are not themselves individually notable. If you return to the article and continue edit warring to restore the inappropriate content once the block expires, you will likely find yourself reblocked indefinitely.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)