User talk:Postconfused

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Talk:Deep Knowledge Ventures. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 14:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * @cyberpower678 I nominated the talk page. Serial Number 54129 moved the page. Now it's fine. My apologies!

A beer for you!

 * Thank you!

Thank you
Hi Postconfused. Thank you for the kind words in the email you sent me! I'm glad we came to common ground on Articles for deletion/Aroma Café. I generally use email for receiving sources from WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request only and would prefer to keep content discussions on-wiki so that they are in one place and can be easily referenced. Feel free to copy the contents of the email to your talk page or to User talk:Cunard for further discussion. Thank you, Cunard (talk) 04:30, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

@Cunard You are very welcome! I would like to create draft for a new article: Robo Director, RoboBoard, AI in the Boardroom, AI and corporate governance. The article on Vital could be merged in this new article and redirected. those are the 3 main references that I would like to use:


 * AI in the Boardroom: The Next Realm of Corporate Governance. MIT Sloan Management Review
 * Corporate Management in the Age of AI. Columbia Business Law Review
 * Bots in the Boardroom: The Promise of AI. Diligen Insight, Anita Sands

What is your view about this? --Postconfused (talk) 05:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I think those sources do support an article for "Robo Director" (or one of the other titles you mentioned). Are you proposing a partial merge where much of the content in VITAL would be lost? VITAL (machine learning software) is an article that is over 1,000 words long so merging the entire article to "Robo Director" would be undue weight. I would prefer not to lose much of the content as the content is well-sourced and due weight in the VITAL article. Cunard (talk) 07:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * @Cunard. Thank you for your answer. I was actually thinking a full merge in order to preserve the content of VITAL (machine learning software). The 3 links above refer to Vital and try to go beyond the press release of Deep Knowledge Venture.
 * The outline of Robo Director could be 1) Context; 2) History; 2.1) VITAL; 2.2) Tieto; 2.3 Einstein; 3) Ethical and Legal Concerns; 4) Publicity Hype. Point 2.1; 3 and are based on the existing VITAL (machine learning software) article. Even if it is a stub, it is much easier to update an exisitng debate. But what is your opinion?  --Postconfused (talk) 08:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * That's a great idea! I am supportive of this proposal if a full merge can be done while complying with the due weight policy. Cunard (talk) 08:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Do not misundertand me. I always prefer saving content. After we finish Robo Director, I think we should disucss how to preserve what we wrote about DKG/DKV ... I have never seen anyone so good at spinning news (Covid, VITAL, etc). They shoudl receive an award. I am not joking. I am going to work on Robo Director tonite (GMT+1). --Postconfused (talk) 08:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I just updated my user page with my philosopies: Inclusionist, Exclusionist, Structurist --Postconfused (talk) 08:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Robo Director


Hello, Postconfused. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robo Director".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Request Edit Assistance - Pluto TV
Hello, I see you are a participant of WikiProject Media. I made some proposals to update the article about Pluto TV, posted here Talk:Pluto TV. Since I have a conflict of interest, I can’t make the changes. Could you possibly have time to look at these? Thank you very much.RadicalBodhi (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)