User talk:Postdepartum

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Fahad Al Butairi has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://youtube.com/fahadalbutairi (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:55, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Fahad at Rehman and Friends 2009.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fahad at Rehman and Friends 2009.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 08:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Telfaz11


The article Telfaz11 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Because the page does not seem notable, but also seems to have some significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ike1x (talk) 13:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Telfaz11


A tag has been placed on Telfaz11 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ike1x (talk) 13:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm Petrb. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Telfaz11 with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Petrb (talk) 12:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Telfaz11 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Telfaz11 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Telfaz11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Ike1x (talk) 15:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Telfaz11, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Telfaz11


A tag has been placed on Telfaz11, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ike1x (talk) 12:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)


 * If an article has been deleted as a result of a deletion discussion, it is not helpful to re-create the article, saying substantially the same things albeit in slightly different words. Also, bombarding an article with dozens of references, all or almost all of which are either unreliable sources or sources not even mentioning the subject of the article (or both) does nothing whatever to establish notability. Doing both of those does not justify re-creating what is essentially the same article on the same subject which still fails to satisfy Wikipedia's notability criteria. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

I believe in good faith that the references cited for the article about Telfaz11 are neither unreliable nor do the several reliable citations count as bombardment, and would like to ask you to kindly reconsider undeletion of the article for Telfaz11 and reinstating it, as it does NOT meet any criteria for deletion; many clear and focused articles have been cited from very reliable sources such as The Washington Post, Toronto Star, and BBC News. Postdepartum (talk) 13:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

October 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fahad Albutairi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. ''You have removed referenced material - again. Please discuss such changes on the article's talk page first.'' Ifnord (talk) 20:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Loujain al-Hathloul, you may be blocked from editing. ''PLEASE, stop removing referenced material. Please discuss such changes on the article's talk page first.'' Ifnord (talk) 20:18, 19 October 2018 (UTC)