User talk:Postiffy223

Speedy deletion nomination of Privileged Access Lifecycle Management


A tag has been placed on Privileged Access Lifecycle Management, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Privileged Access Lifecycle Management and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DES (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Privileged Access Lifecycle Management


The article Privileged Access Lifecycle Management has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Describes a propriatary product, but doesn't make that fact clear. Product appears not to be notable, no significant third-part coverage found on a google search, mearly many copies of the company's own white papers. Cited refs are an article that doesn't mention the specific product (or term), and routine mentions of buisness aquistions that don't establish notability. G11 speedy decliend, because if notability were to be established this would be acceptable in tone.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DES (talk) 18:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)