User talk:Postlewaight

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. - gadfium 18:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article must include proper sources. - gadfium 22:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your email. You must cite sources for additions to Wikipedia, particularly when they concern living people. Your personal knowledge is not sufficient. Please see the links I have provided you with above.- gadfium 08:19, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * You seem to misunderstand. I'm not saying that the material you added was or was not accurate. I'm saying that material added must include the reliable sources that it comes from. Your personal experience is not a reliable source for the purposes of an encyclopedia. In your email, you say that the material is easily verified, so please include this verification in the article. I think you must not have read the biographical information about living persons and sources links I gave you before.- gadfium 20:40, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

May 2009
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.  Web H amster  20:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Candy. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cyber cobra (talk) 23:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Response to above comments
Gentlemen,

Thanks for the comments. Wish I had noticed the older ones at the time they were composed. As it is, I can't even remember the change I made to "Candy" let alone the earlier ones.

Can I suggest that, when someone seeks to correct an insertion, the old and new text are reproduced for completeness?

Postlewaight (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Pearse. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bzuk (talk) 16:31, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Response to above comments
This apparently-common Wikipedia phrase "Your edits appear to constitute vandalism" is offensive and insulting. Whose opinion is to be more-valued when assessing if an edit is "unconstructive"? Where does your authority come from, to over-ride other people's edits? Are you the same snotty-nosed bastard who said similar things about my edits to Rachel Hunter? Who are you guys?

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)