User talk:Posxt

AfD nomination of Multi-level cosmology
An editor has nominated Multi-level cosmology, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 15:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Just for the record when they have been deleted, you also created: Multi-level universe, One-level universe and Immortology. Externally, you have this stuff here and . -- RHaworth 14:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Multi-level Cosmology in Ultimate Fate of the Universe
Hi, Posxt. I noticed you added multi-level cosmology back to Ultimate fate of the universe. I still think multi-level cosmology should be excluded for all the reasons stated at Articles for deletion/Multi-level cosmology. I have started a discussion about multi-level cosmology on the talk page for Ultimate fate of the universe. Would you please post the reasons you support multi-level cosmology on the article's talk page? I would especially like it if you would address the issues brought up when the multi-level cosmology article was deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kevinwiatrowski (talk • contribs) 04:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC).

AfD nomination of Scientific immortology
I've nominated Scientific immortology, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Scientific immortology satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Scientific immortology and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Scientific immortology during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Lambiam Talk 19:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

No more
No more links to Hucko's site, thanks. Guy (Help!) 20:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)