User talk:Potenca Potenco301

Nomination of Ethan Conrad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethan Conrad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ethan Conrad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Britishfinance (talk) 22:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at C. E. Conrad Memorial Cemetery, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. spam links to other unrelated cemeteries   DGG ( talk ) 16:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at C. E. Conrad Memorial Cemetery. ''Deliberate links to wrong individual, to support a promotional article on him. ''  DGG ( talk ) 16:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  DGG ( talk ) 16:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC)