User talk:Potito m. petrone

Hello, thank you for the sources about Monte Bianco at the List of countries by highest point. Unfortunately, like most users of English wikipedia, I do not read Italian. Has the joint ownership of the summit been recognised by the French authorities, contrary to official French mapping? If so, please translate the passage which states this. Then these sources should be transferred to the Monte Bianco page. Thanks, Viewfinder (talk) 15:01, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Great Power
Please do not make unilateral disruptive edits as you did in the above article. If you continue you will be reported. Thankyou. Colliver55 (talk) 11:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

You will get nowhere by vandalising the page. It will simply be reverted. Colliver55 (talk) 18:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:07, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Possible Sockpuppetry
Hey. We're just making sure, because it's strange that you, Alantix, and Right nation have the same MO, very similar user pages, and that Right nation and Alantix were created very recently. Our project has had plenty of problems with this in the past, as these pages are POV magnets for nationalism and 'if this country is there, my country is there.' type of thing going on. Please, if you're going to add Italy as a great power, please get some reliable sources that state Italy is a great power by academics and experts, and not sources like wikipedia or CIA world factbook. While CIA WORLD FACTBOOK is a great source for facts, it just gives facts, and doesn't make real analysis, etc. If we're going by facts, we can make a large amount of countries in the world seem like Great Powers. happy editing.Deavenger (talk) 18:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Area metropolitana
Ciao, io sono un'esperta di aree metropolitane italiane, posso dirti, e poi anche rendertene conto stesso tu, che l'area metropolitana di napoli è la seconda per popolazione per la maggioranza delle fonti ( Eurostat, Onu, Svimez, Censis ( che addirittura ne calcola circa 5 milioni di influenza), ecc.. solo l'Oced e un'altra se non erro, la raffigurano come la terza area dopo quella di Roma e non si è capito su quali criteri precisi, in più!! per popolazione è senza dubbio la seconda, ripeto, per la maggiorenza delle fonti ( puoi dare un'occhiata nel paragrafo urbanistico di Napoli, sulla wiki italiana, dopo, a mio parere, è stato spiegato tutto egregiamente).. Dunque, credo che non sia giusto mettere Napoli a lato e scrivere: "l'area metropolitana di napoli è la seconda o la terza" e far raffigurare, nello schema, l'area di Roma come la seconda (per via di una sola o massimo due fonti che la raffigurano tale!! contro la maggioranza di altre fonti che raffigurano quella napoletana come la seconda, non lo trovo corretto!). Io non faccio un discorso di parte, non sono nè romana nè napoletana, faccio solo un discorso oggettivo ed enciclopedico. spero che mi sia spiegata e mi affido a te, che d'inglese ne sai più di me!! io lo conosco solo a livello scolastico e potrei scrivere un paragrafo con errori!!! ci pensi tu a far capire questo dato alla pagina circa l'italia?? grazie, ciao buona serata!--Focak (talk) 21:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)