User talk:Potogoto1

September 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kuwait Airways, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 16:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Jetstreamer, I apologise for that edit. My internet was playing up, and when I tried to submit changes multiple times, they may have messed up. Thanks for changing them back. I've corrected my mistakes, and it's now ordered, and 'readable'Potogoto1 (talk) 16:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Planespotters
Planespotters is not considered a reliable source.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 10:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Planespotters
Hi Jetstreamer, online, i have found websites such as planespotters.net and airfleets.net are quite accurate, up to the point of an airline's own blog. Planespotters.net changes, and yes, It's not a source page that is static. It is a reliable source, but also shows aircraft that are stored as well. You'll see i removed the 737 classics from citilink, as they're no longer active, but stored, just like a lot of other airline pages. Please also note, that not everything external is completeley accurate. I understand the point you're making by this, but as far as I know, planespotters.net is a resource that is quite decent on reliability.

Potogoto1 (talk) 16:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)