User talk:Poverty78

Image copyright problem with Image:Povheadshot.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Povheadshot.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. JD554 (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Thomas Abate
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thomas Abate, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Thomas Abate. Stephenb (Talk) 09:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Thomas Abate has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 10:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Thomas Abate constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Steve Crossin (talk) 10:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Thomas Abate. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Steve Crossin (talk) 10:17, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Thomas Abate. Steve Crossin (talk) 10:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
Please stop edit-warring on the Thomas Abate article. I have blocked you temporarily whilst I try to work out what is going on. Black Kite 10:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Unblocked
I have worked on the page to bring it up to Wikipedia standards. However, Abate may still not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines (see WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC). Please add information to the article that may help it reach those standards. Thanks, Black Kite 10:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Povheadshot.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Povheadshot.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 19:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Povertyrapper.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Povertyrapper.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Internet Cam Whore Database
A tag has been placed on Internet Cam Whore Database requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. nneonneo talk 18:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)