User talk:Povlsen


 * }

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Reaction-logotype-positive.png
Thanks for uploading File:Reaction-logotype-positive.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:36, 14 December 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:36, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SEEMPubS (EU Project)


The article SEEMPubS (EU Project) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * More Eurospam. No independent sources. No indication of notability. Does not meet any notability guideline including WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 18:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Reaction Project (EU Project)


The article The Reaction Project (EU Project) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Eurospam. New project. No indication of notability, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 18:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about SEEMPubS (EU Project)
Hello, Povlsen, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/SEEMPubS (EU Project) whether the article SEEMPubS (EU Project) should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving SEEMPubS (EU Project), which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Crusio (talk) 11:26, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about The Reaction Project (EU Project)
Hello, Povlsen, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/The Reaction Project (EU Project) whether the article The Reaction Project (EU Project) should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving The Reaction Project (EU Project), which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Crusio (talk) 11:27, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

On deletion of articles
Hi, I noticed you expressed opinions on the deletion of articles The Reaction Project (EU Project) and SEEMPubS (EU Project). In order for an article to remain on Wikipedia, its subject must meet a certain threshold of notability. Usually this means that the subject must have been the topic of coverage in reliable sources that are totally independent of the subject. A full explanation of the notability criteria can be found here. Additionally, an article must be written from a neutral point of view. Filling an article with the same type of language that one would put in a brochure or grant application is not appropriate.

I should also let you know how the article creation/submission and deletion process works. Wikipedia has no editorial board, and no one "approves" articles. Once an article is created, it is part of Wikipedia unless it gets deleted. An article is only deleted if it qualifies for deletion under the deletion policy. These articles have seven days in which you (or anyone) must demonstrate that the subject does not qualify for deletion under the policy, otherwise they will be deleted. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for you help, I'll try my best! How does the discussion work, who decides when the article does not qualify for deletion any more? If it the articles get deleted can I try again? also is it possible to prolong the trial-period? (going away for a while with no internet)--Povlsen (talk) 16:20, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * A full explanation of how an article deletion discussion works can be found here. At the end of 7 days, an administrator will look over the discussion to determine whether the consensus is in favor of deleting, keeping, or doing something else. It is important to note that this is a consensus, not a majority vote. If the administrator believes that there is no consensus, s/he has discretion to either extend the discussion for another 7 days, or close the discussion as "no consensus" and therefore keep the article. If the article(s) are deleted, administrators have access to the article for some time (I don't know how long) and may be able to restore it to your user space for you to work on in draft format. You can even request the articles be moved now, or you can wait and see how the deletion discussions go.
 * I should note that there are many subjects that just plain don't merit an article on Wikipedia, no matter how much work is put into them. If that is the case with these two articles, I would advise checking this page for a list of sites using wiki technology that may be willing to host your content. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 16:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SEEMPubs Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:SEEMPubs Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC)