User talk:Powder River 1865

Welcome!
Hi, Powder River 1865. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. OxonAlex   - talk  18:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Also note that Minor edits are those could never practically be opposed, and not for adding or removing actual content from an article. Thanks again,  OxonAlex    - talk  18:02, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Powder River 1876. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Unfortunately, I need to block this account because you created this account in order to get around the block on your previous account,. However, as a couple administrators indicated at Sockpuppet investigations/Powder River 1876, given your good-faith contributions to date, we would look favorably upon an unblock request that demonstrates that you understand why you were blocked previously. For guidance, see Guide to appealing blocks. Mz7 (talk) 19:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I took a look through the archives of the Unblock Ticket Request System, but I could not find the approved request you referred to—all of the requests you submitted to have your previous account (Powder River 1867) unblocked were declined, and indeed, your previous account remains blocked. Your previous account was blocked for copyright violations. I would be willing to unblock you if you explain why your previous edits constituted copyright infringement and how you will avoid similar mistakes regarding copyright violations in the future. Do you think you could elaborate on that? Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 06:28, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I believe by "approved" the user is referring the fact that an account creator created this new account for them. I am not an account creator so I don't know if the user was being honest in their ACC request or not. Sro23 (talk) 07:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alexander Moore (soldier)


The article Alexander Moore (soldier) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability, one of 400,000 buried at Arlington, an officer but not a very high ranking one, mentioned in some sources but not indepth."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC)