User talk:Powerking

Image copyright problem with Image:Jamal_kelly.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Jamal_kelly.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Image legality questions. 11:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Jamal_kelly.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jamal_kelly.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Image legality questions. 12:22, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Your note on Talk:Main Page
Greetings Powerking!

I saw that you placed a notice on Talk:Main Page regarding an article you wrote that had been speedily deleted. I would like to apologise for what you percieved as elitism on wikipedia, I can assure you that that was not the case. We have to have a very high tolerance for what articles are included or not, and many new users might see that as elitism. This is simply so we can create the best encyclopedia possible.

The fact is, A LOT of junk gets added every day to wikipedia (and when I say "a lot", I mean humongous piles of crap, towering towards the sky), and sometimes good faith articles, like your one, simply gets deleted because of poor formatting, or other reasons. Also, alot of people write in about people they know, or their family, and those articles are not ok to have.

How about you provide some information about the subject you wrote about, and I'll see what I can do to help. Why not give wikipedia another try, once you get to know a little bit about us and our procedures, you might notice that we aren't that bad after all :D Most of us are lovely people, willing to help.

Now, I can't guarantee anything, but if you are willing to provide me with the name of the article that was deleted, and perhaps some information about the subject, it might make it's way into the encyclopedia after all. Please respond to my talk page, located at User talk:Oskar Sigvardsson (press the "+" at the top of the page to add a new section)

Oskar 15:29, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

PS. Talk:Main Page is only used for discussions regarding the main page only, that's why your comment was deleted. I apologise on behalf of the rest of the wiki if you were insulted by it

^^^^^^^^
Yeah, so stop calling the rest of the inhabitants of the world "assholes" if you don't 'click' with them.



Even though I personally don't agree with the fact that 'it':

"The article was at Jamal Kelly. It was tagged for deletion as nn-bio by Bobak and deleted by Stifle. Admins can view the content that was removed here. --GraemeL (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)"

should have been speedily deleted, I also have read:

"Personally, I think that it didn't quite fit into the CSD A7 bracket as it did make an assertion of notability, having released CDs. However, with 10 hits, it had a snowball's chance in hell of being kept at AfD so it should've been prod'd. By the way, you write quite well so please keep it up, just with more notable subjects next time :). --Cel es tianpower háblame 15:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)"

which pretty much summarizes the problem (thanks Cel es tianpower).

Nonsense
If you do not cease adding nonsense articles, and generally making a nuisance of yourself, your account will be blocked. ---Charles 18:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Physicsdiagram1.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Physicsdiagram-1.jpg. The copy called Image:Physicsdiagram-1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate Image:Amarr logo.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Amarr logo.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Amarr logo.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Amarr logo.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Amarr logo.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:52, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Product thumb.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Product thumb.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 02:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC)