User talk:Powerviki

Welcome!
Hello, Powerviki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Powerviki. Thank you for your work on Arun Gowda. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 19:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Help with a page I created?
Hi, I noticed you removed some Amazon links from a page I created. Could you possible help me review my draft? 2601:188:CE80:E280:24EC:52D8:E0C8:E671 (talk) 08:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry, draft name is J. J. Hebert 2601:188:CE80:E280:24EC:52D8:E0C8:E671 (talk) 08:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

I removed amazon link not only from your page i removed it from other pages as well because it is not reliable as per Wikipedia policies. I will review your page soon give me some time. I did my research and added some new references. You added weak references so i replaced those. Your request for review was rejected by other user but don’t worry you can resubmit. If you need more help let me know.

March 2024
You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note, this is not the historical paper in any way; it's just a group of promoters hijacking the name. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note, this is not the historical paper in any way; it's just a group of promoters hijacking the name. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)



User:Kuru sorry sir. I did not know these sites are not good. thelosangelestribune had message “since 1886” i thought this is old news paper. I added these source because user asked for help but I didn’t know they are not allowed. I apologise for my mistake. Have a good day sir. Powerviki (talk) 09:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Arun Gowda moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Arun Gowda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 01:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)