User talk:Poxism

August 2020
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Names of large numbers for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 21:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Names of large numbers, you may be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 09:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Names of large numbers. - DVdm (talk) 10:15, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 10:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: your source is not a wp:reliable source, which was explained to you with this comment on the article talk page, and with the above warnings here on your user talk page. You ignored all explanatins and warnings, and continued adding (1) content to the article and (2) inappropriate comments on the talk page. Your block was for disrupting the talk page with comments about inappropriate content. - DVdm (talk) 11:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Because of WP:IDHT and WP:SPA, I have revoked talk page access. Another admin will be along shortly to review the open unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.