User talk:Poyapictures

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Because your account was used for promotion of a company, group, product or organization with a username that promotes or implies affiliation with the aforementioned. Wikipedia does not allow any form of spam or other promotion of people, products, companies or other groups (even non-commercial or charitable ones). Using Wikipedia for such purposes will result in the blocking of the account involved. Please read FAQ/Organization and Conflict of interest for our policies about this.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

In addition, user accounts are for individuals only, not for companies or groups or other collective editing. Your username should reflect this. Usernames that appear to be promotional (such as those that make reference to a company or product) violate our username policy and are typically blocked to enforce that policy.


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text below this message box.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Tell us what new username you want to use. Please make sure that your new username does not violate our username policy and check that it has not already been taken (click here to search).
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If instead you believe that you have been blocked by mistake (i.e., you have not in fact been using Wikipedia for promotional purposes), please write below this message box and replace the text "Your reason here" with the reason why. See also Appealing a block for more information. -- Alexf(talk) 15:08, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Poyapictures! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Adrian Fulle -


 * Your only edits to this point are to promote a single individual and non-notable films. Should you ever be unblocked, this will not be permitted to continue, even if you change your username.  You have massive conflict of interest, and seem to have no understanding of our requirements for ACTUAL notability  D  P  16:49, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Adrian Fulle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrian Fulle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Adrian Fulle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. D P  16:44, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Love 101 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love 101 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Love 101 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. D P  16:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Adrian Fulle for deletion
The Adrian Fulle page has already been adjusted by Wikipedia to better reflect a page that adheres to the Wikipedia guidelines. I'm not sure why it needs to be deleted. Adrian Fulle has done enough movies and popular entertainment to warrant the page on wikipedia. Poyapictures (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Poyapictures

Nomination of Love 101 for deletion
The page for LOVE 101 adheres to the Wikipedia guidelines and policies and should not be deleted. It is a popular independent film with celebrity actors starring in it who are, themselves, on Wikipedia. Michael Muhney and Jeff Anderson are celebrity actors who have their own pages on Wikipedia.

Michael Muhney: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Muhney

Jeff Anderson: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Anderson

Poyapictures (talk) 18:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Poyapictures