User talk:Ppcnewjersey

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Ppcnewjersey) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization or adding links to its website.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. The article in question is Peter Staats. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Metzger (doctor)


A tag has been placed on Scott Metzger (doctor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Staats


A tag has been placed on Peter Staats, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Scott Metzger (doctor)
Hello Ppcnewjersey. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Scott Metzger (doctor), you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Creating articles to promote your organisation's staff
You are editing Wikipedia with an apparent view to create promotional articles about the staff who either own or work in your organisation, Premier Pain Centers. Elsewhere you have admitted that you are a representative of that organisation. You should be aware that this is deprecated.

Wikipedia is not a vehicle for self promotion or for the promotion of an organisation. Even when you re-log in from another username, something likely to be necessary since yours is a username that is probably against Wikipedia policies, please do not edit or create such articles. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * So then who creates articles on the other physicians that are on Wikipedia? It's not a vehicle for self-promotion if you are posting in a neutral POV and are also trying to correct confusion. Ppcnewjersey (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * People who are in no way related to them. Pages are created by uninvolved editors. Those physicians get listed by serendipity, not by a corporate PR machine. If they are truly notable then they will find their place here. It is not for those associated with them to attmept to hang their shingles up here. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * That's somewhat idealistic, isn't it? Long story short: both articles you have issue with are written in a neutral fashion, one of which is SPECIFICALLY there to correct an incorrect article. I could see your issue if Premier Pain Center itself was listed, but it's not. My only problem was that I was too honest in creating the username. Ppcnewjersey (talk) 22:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * To me each article looks promotional. It also interested me that these are highly polished edits as your first contribution to Wikipedia. That is unusual. Not impossible, but unusual. That made me concerned about the articles and your own status as an editor. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Actually I've made edits on Wikipedia for years, I just created a separate account for doing articles in a more professional matter. (again, me being honest) And if you want, I can link you to physicians' articles that are much, MUCH more promotional than this. If you could, maybe we can come to a compromise and you can tell me what is promotional about these articles.  It lists their qualifications, where they went to school, what their specialty is, and the name of their practice. Also lists the reason why they are note worthy for Wikipedia (being best doctors as named by their peers) Ppcnewjersey (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * You might like to consider your multiple usernames as unwise. Since you have edited for some years you will know all about WP:Sockpuppetry. Often, but by no means always, people use multiple identities for less than goof faith reasons, unless they take the small trouble to link them together. You might wish to take that small trouble. Since this is a single purpose account which has, so far, been used only for the purposes of Premier Pain Centers, and seems to be limited to editing those articles by its name, I find it hard to continue to assume good faith.
 * With regard to the other doctors, and the other Metzger, if you feel strongly, nominate them for deletion. As for yours (a possessive pronoun I used advisedly, I am very unsure that peer co-promotion is a valid reason for asserting any form of notability. "You nominate me and I'll nominate you" springs to mind. To me they pass the duck test of being promotional. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scott Metzger (disambiguation)


The article Scott Metzger (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * disambiguation page where all but one of the articles have also been prodded

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rahaeli (talk) 00:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of what username you choose. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. 7 00:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)