User talk:Ppetriy/Victoria Earle Matthews/Bibliography

First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that describes the subject in a clear way? I loved that you went into detail about each story an author puts out there is so telling to them. So, adding the short stories is nice! What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? I would say add to tribute because right now it seems insufficient but i am sure there are some more tributes or other stories books that were inspired by her! What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? I think expand on tribute and maybe more on the marriage and family life section. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? I liked that they made a section for short stories. Although it doesn't relate to my article exactly It gave me the idea that maybe there is a book written on the society I am writing about. Looking at the lead by itself, do I feel satisfied that I know the importance of the topic? Yes, you can definitely tell the importance of the topic.

Looking at the lead again after reading the rest of the article, does the lead reflect the most important information? Yes, it does reflect the most important information Does the lead give more weight to certain parts of the article over others? Is anything missing? Is anything redundant? No, I think overall it's a great lead Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? I think they’re organized well but some areas just need more information if possible. Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? The journalism section seemed a bit irrelevant to be its own section. I think It could be a subsection for another part. Does the article reflect all the perspectives represented in the published literature? Are any significant viewpoints left out or missing? Yes, I think the article does reflect all the perspectives in regards to her literature. Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? No it was very unbiased. Do you think you could guess the perspective of the author by reading the article? No, i think it's unbiased Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y." No, I didnt see any; it was written in a very unbiased way! Does the article make claims on behalf of unnamed groups or people? For example, "some people say..." No it doesn’t Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic. I think it does a good job not focusing on one or the other.Collinshannah78 (talk) 05:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)