User talk:Ppie223

January 2014
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.


 * Please reply to the points raised at Talk:The_Hidden_Wiki instead of hitting the revert button without discussion.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 10:40, 25 January 2014 (UTC)


 * A Wikipedia page about a website isn't simply about the content of the website, it's also about a brand, people behind it, etc. Just because someone downloaded The Hidden Wiki and is now hosting it doesn't mean the page should reflect that the site is online. With Tor it's even more complicated, but sites are hijacked, copied, etc. with malicious intent all the time. Best practice is not to link to them unless (a) it's an official mirror or (b) significant secondary sources have covered the mirror as the new primary site (e.g. Encyclopedia Dramatica). Also, you've now made 3 reverts in a day. Another one violates the bright line 3 revert rule. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  14:49, 25 January 2014 (UTC)