User talk:Ppoojawiki/Exome

Peer Review Suggestions from DrLibraryCat
Thank you for your thorough work, and thanks to the reviewers below for their detailed suggestions. I agree that the addition of synonyms is smart, and also that it would be helpful to pick a single term (the one in the article title) to use throughout the article. I also think there should be a shorter lead section before the contents box. I love how many links you included to other wiki articles.DrLibraryCat (talk) 01:12, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Exome Peer Review 1
I like how the term “exome” was added as another word that also means the coding region, but it would be helpful for the reader, and for continuity, if either “exome,” “coding region,” or “CDS” was used as the subject throughout the article. Right now, the lede refers to it as the exome, while the rest of the article uses CDS. Although it is hard to find pictures, another possible improvement would be to add one depicting how the exome differs from introns and encodes the final protein to be translated. That would make it easier to visualize what the exome really is. For the coding sequence annotation section, it would be helpful to define what that means in other words, or at least the word annotation in this context, so that a broader audience will understand. For organization, combining the two words that exome is commonly confused with, transcriptome and cDNA, would make the article more cohesive. Just a minor tip, the citations, like for 1 and 5, go outside the period. Some more positive aspects of the article are the inclusion of more terms in the “see also” section with a short definition of the term and the inclusion of more sources. Overall, the article is well balanced and unbiased. Nmcmyn (talk) 22:32, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Exome Peer Review 2
I like the addition of synonym for exome, as the synonym is quite clear in its definition. I think that an image mapping the exam's passage from the nucleus, getting spliced, and ultimately ending up in the cytoplasm or ribosome would be really helpful to visualize what is happening. I think the cDNA section is kind of random in its placement, as I am not really sure exactly what it has to do with the exome, besides just being a reverse transcription product. However, I think you could definitely add a section that has to do with scientific applications of the exome, as in what sort of experiments, manipulations, and relevance that exist through the exome. In this section you could add the cDNA manipulations. As mentioned early, the page could really use some pictures, especially referring to some of this scientific relevance section. 35.1.84.170 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.243.133.174 (talk) 02:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review MLibrarian
I like your article but I agree that a figure would be very useful. Please also check the references section. Try to link them to original articles. In original wiki article on Exome, ref 3 leads to a publication. When you copied that, the link was lost and now the same reference - also ref 3 in your text - leads to the Wiki page on doi (unrelated). Other references have similar problems so please check them all.MLibrarian (talk) 13:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)