User talk:Pqip/Scotoplanes globosa

peer review
I think you did a great job so far with the Anatomy section. I would like to hear more about the weird things it has on its mouth, because you talk about the feet and the upper feet on its back, too. I know you also wanted to add to the etymology section. I don't see that anywhere in your sandbox, but maybe I'm looking in the wrong place? If you haven't started it yet, totally cool, but I think it's definitely worthwhile to add to the article. I also think it may help to define gametogenesis, or at least link the article to that word in your edit of the Anatomy section. Otherwise, nice job!

I thought that you did a great job with the added information! In the sandbox, the information appears to be cited correctly and the language is accessible. I like how the information from the article was summarized and implemented in the wikipedia article. The information is properly cited so that the authors work is properly given credit. One note about how to improve the added content is for ecology. Instead of having two beginning large sentences, they could be condensed to "Congregations of smaller Scotoplanes globosa are often observed on the ocean floor in groups of 10 to 30 individuals, but have been documented in groups of up to 600 individuals". This is more of a stylistic comment, but the information in the two sentences is informative. Lastly, whenever a number is given, like 10 to 30, a unit should be given as well to make sure the context is understood. Otherwise, this sandbox was well done.Rpsenka (talk) 01:56, 30 March 2022 (UTC)