User talk:Pquentinj

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! hydnjo talk 13:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

List of unaccredited institutions of higher learning
You have now added the same content twice, both times without edit summaries, and ignoring the point made in the edit summary when your edit was reverted that this special pleading has already been removed by consensus following other discussions. There is no valid principled objection to accreditation, numerous seminaries and Christian colleges are accredited through TRACS, a body set up for that specific purpose. Please take it to the talk page rather than simply reverting. Just zis Guy you know? 18:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * User:Pquentinj, the problem is your adding POV. If you wish to add something surrounding accreditation it should come from a source, preferably an academic source (which is what accreditation is). Until you support claims with facts your edits are considered POV. Once cited they should be judged for validity and value based on the content and source. Also please stop adding links as if they are wiki-links, relevant links should be at the bottom of the page or at the end of the sentence. Arbusto 04:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Please do not attempt to whitewash unaccredited schools. Not only is this considered vandalism, there is strong precedent for Wikipedia ensuring that potential students are not misled since these school shave historically gone to great lengths to disguise and gloss over their lack of accreditation. You do not WP:OWN the article, it belongs to Wikipedia, and neutral point of view means stating all sides factually, not excising criticism. Just zis Guy you know? 08:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I acknowledge your point regarding "ownership" and am not suggesting otherwise. However, on this list, you are excluding a "fair" point of view that is at odds with your own agenda. That is hardly a "neutral" position. In fact, my additiond to your list page are exactly what you encourage elsewhere, a "criticism" of its content, a corrective that allows for "all sides" to state their view "factually." Although some schools have sought to "disguise and gloss over their lack of accreditation," it is wrong to suggest that all schools are in this camp.
 * What agenda would that be? I wasn't aware I had one. Just zis Guy you know? 18:35, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Whitefield College
Your reversions of material unflattering to this school are becoming tiresome. Please discuss it on the Talk page, and use edit syummaries when editing. If you continue reverting to a whitewashed version you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia, as this is considered as vandalism. Just zis Guy you know? 18:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I am using the talk page of the school, please see my comments there

Ditto Association of Christian Schools International. Just zis Guy you know? 18:53, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Sproul Jr.
Please lend your thoughts to Talk:R. C. Sproul, Jr.. --Flex 20:17, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:Whitefield Heraldry 3.png, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 09:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CHA Official Seal.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:CHA Official Seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Chamberlain-Hunt Academy Official Seal.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Chamberlain-Hunt Academy Official Seal.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:48, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Whitefield Academy -Lions Sports Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Whitefield Academy -Lions Sports Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Whitefield Academy -Lions Sports Logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:Whitefield Academy -Lions Sports Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Whitefield Academy (Missouri) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whitefield Academy (Missouri), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Whitefield Academy (Missouri) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)