User talk:Pquinton

December 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

- Understood and I agree Pquinton (talk) 13:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

What is your association with Clarity Travel Management? If you are an employee, you are a paid editor. You don't have to be specifically asked or directed to edit Wikipedia. Also, please expand on what you mean by "useful citations"; what articles or topic areas do you want to edit in? 331dot (talk) 20:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

globally renamed ClarityTravelManagement to Pquinton amd unblock discussion
I globally renamed ClarityTravelManagement to Pquinton. Please see User:Deepfriedokra/decline promo renamed for my usual conditions for unblock in these instances. You will not be allowed to edit about ClarityTravelManagement  in any event, though you could possibly suggest edits. Please tell us what constructive edits you might make.--  Deep fried  okra    23:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for confirming, I'm a complete novice when it comes to Wikipedia and I had no idea that was breaking any rules. (Please accept my apologies for this) I initially just wanted to update some out-of-date information on the Clarity Travel Management page which I did and I believe benefits the community. Is there any way this page can have the redirect taken off it so that it is accessible again? Going forward I will ensure that I only add general information about the industry. --Pquinton (talk) 16:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * It's going to be difficult for you to edit about your industry due to your conflict of interest. You may find reading this plain language explanation of the conflict of interest policy helpful; I would direct your attention to the line from that page "Do not edit articles about yourself, your family or friends, your organization, your clients, or your competitors".  Are there any other subjects that you want to edit about?
 * It's unlikely the article about Clarity Travel Management will be restored unless it can be demonstrated how the company meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company and why it would merit an article separate from the individual. 331dot (talk) 16:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the plain language explanation. After reading this I have no interest in editing or adding any relevant content at all, in any industry.

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because all of the information contained within the page references external and impartial sources. The company is notable, so surely it makes more sense to highlight the areas of concern and edit these, as opposed to removing the page entirely?--Pquinton (talk) 15:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC)