User talk:Prabhukmv

Nomination of India Institute for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article India Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/India Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  10:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Paid editing?
Hello Prabhukmv. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

=voluntary=

Hello Sir, Firstly I apologize if i am violating any serious rules of Wikipedia. secondly, i would like to inform you that through out my career i was in science and engineering back ground. In due course i developed interest in policy sphere and am doing an internship in India institute to get an idea of policy reforms in India, it is to emphasize that even though i have no previous experience they allowed me to work with them basing only on my motivation towards learning, also i am not there in their pay rolls. I realized that this institute does not has any Wikipedia page and volunteered to create one, and i am afraid you are mistaken because i am not compensated either directly or indirectly for editing this page. It is purely done out of enthusiasm, but i tried to abide all the laws of Wikipedia. After seeing the major reasons for nomination of deletion, that is; 1)page is orphan as it is not linked with any other articles 2)it does not identify itself with a category, I linked the page to two other Wikipedia links and also added category and was constantly working to improve the page. I kindly request you to resurface the page on Wikipedia and serve its purpose of contributing to the database of Wikipedia and knowledge to people in general. I also request you to list all the non conformity points so that i could comply to them. I perceive that i answered the COI mentioned, if not please provide further instructions and suggestions(so as to keep the page back on Wikipedia). I look forward for a win win situation. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.160.36.81 (talk) 10:02, 7 July 2016 (UTC)