User talk:Pracar

You are really risking to get blocked
Neo-Nazi expressions like "cultural superiority" have no place in Wikipedia articles, that's the first thing.

Second, you can't change people in the infobox without a discussion on the talk page! And Rokosovsky was not even Belarusian.

It's as simple as that. If you will continue operating by doing changes without discussing them first you will get reverted and eventually get blocked. Mr. Sort It Out (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * There is no Neo-Nazi expressions. You should read more attentively. The question was about the struggle between cultures of groups within one nation, not between two peoples (nations). Rokosovsky's mother was a Belarusian. Look again. // Modern scientists of Belarusian Academy of Sciences believe that Belarusians have occurred not earlier than the 13th century (I cited the sources that You have deleted), so Euphrosyne of Polotsk (she died in the 12th century) was not a Belarusian. I am ready to discuss the question about the infobox after returning of my edits. // Respectfully yours --Pracar (talk) 22:32, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * You really are weird. Do you really think you can make any demands? You are the one who wants to make a change, therefore it's up to you to prove on the talk page why this change should be made in a collage which was here for years. Until then, I will simply be obliged to revert you. Your life will be made easier if you learn the rules of Wikipedia first. Mr. Sort It Out (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

I make no demands, and I just indicate that my edits are made on the basis of the official publication of the Belarusian Academy of Sciences. And the infobox was created by participants without reading this scientific books.--Pracar (talk) 08:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * "And the infobox was created by participants without reading this scientific books" - You must be really joking me. Scientific books, for an infobox? Said the guy who tried to add the Pole Rokassovsky?
 * Very nice you rely on one publication which was used before you anyway in the collage. However, I don't see what right it gives you to delete other info. 109.149.66.236 (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Just stop
Please stop making edits in Grand Duchy of Lithuania article. And furthermore, STOP EDIT WARRING. If you want something to appear in the article then go to Talk:Grand Duchy of Lithuania and discuss it there! If you'll continue edit wars then I'll have no other choice, but to report you to the admins. It is also known that Belarusian historians like to fictionalize history to their favor (I'm pretty sure you know what "litvinists" are and I'm starting to think that you're on of them). – Sabbatino (talk) 07:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * But I have rights and sence of making edits in "Grand Duchy of Lithuania" article.--Pracar (talk) 08:26, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Your edits DON'T MAKE SENSE, because you're edit warring. Take it to the Talk:Grand Duchy of Lithuania before adding adding something. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:28, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Really?--Pracar (talk) 08:29, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks like I'll have to report you, because you try to "win history" by edit warring. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
 * Without signature?--Pracar (talk) 09:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for your censorship.--Pracar (talk) 07:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)