User talk:Pradoblaze

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Blogs as references
Hi there, re: your edit here, per WP:UGC we do not use blogs as references, since anyone with an internet connection can create a blog and call himself an expert on any given subject. We're only interested in what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say. There's nothing to indicate reviewmachi.com would meet this criterion. Other examples of insufficient sources include discussion forums, website comments, unverified Twitter accounts, IMDb, even Wikipedia itself. Please stick to mainstream sources like major newspapers, magazines and their online presences. (The Hindu, Hindustani Times, Times of India, etc.) Please also familiarize yourself with our general guidelines on reliable sources as well as our stance on user-generated content. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)