User talk:Pragmocialist

Welcome
 Hello Доктор прагматик, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Доктор прагматик, good luck, and have fun. -- доктор   прагматик   22:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Chris Allen (academic)
Please refer to our BLP policy for why that information needs to be removed. If you want to help, find references. As it stands, there is no valid indication that the person is notable in the first place. Thank you. 207.157.121.92 (talk) 15:30, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Information.svg Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. 207.157.121.92 (talk) 15:40, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I suggested you read the BLP policy. Please do so, and please do not abuse rollback for reverting good-faith edits that follow our guidelines. 207.157.121.92 (talk) 15:40, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Browse through the history of the article and you'll see what's going on. Someone put up a resume--at some point it looked like this, a typical puff piece. Deletion is not the best answer; improvement is, but first the puffery must be cut. 207.157.121.92 (talk) 15:44, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Vandalism template ? It seems you need to observe my reverts thoroughly. Yeah i agree, i saw older versions, now it has become some encyclopedic. -- доктор   прагматик   15:48, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


 * If you really want to improve the article, and thus the project, look at this. Much more fun than either trimming or reverting other editors. As for the warning: no, you need to observe my edits carefully. You gave me a vandalism warning, not the other way around. Please read WP:VANDAL. 207.157.121.92 (talk) 15:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I will love to, but it has responsible editors like you, thus leaves no reason to worry. At the same time i also encourage you to create an account. -- доктор   прагматик   15:55, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, look at the article again. If you want to become a better writer, go through edit by edit. You'll see that I reorganized the article (so it conforms more to the Manual of Style), that I added a bunch of reliable sources that indicate he has indeed an international reputation, and that I trimmed the things (except for the academic career--that's not really controversial and it's very factual in tone) that could not be easily verified and may constitute puffery, for instance. Note also little changes, like the tag--from "refimprove" to "BLP sources", and the removal of the individual "cn" tags. Finally, note that the references establish without a doubt that the person deserves a Wikipedia article. Now consider something else--you can do this as well. (And I don't really want an account right now.) Good luck. 207.157.121.92 (talk) 16:15, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Queen Vic
Please see this page: http://www.london2012.com/athlete/pendleton-victoria-1093801/ --180.183.136.237 (talk) 07:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Are not you able to distinguish between a building and an athelete. -- доктор   прагматик   18:13, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Vishwanath Tamasker for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vishwanath Tamasker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vishwanath Tamasker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Harsh (talk)  07:27, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Seems to be okay! I read a book, something like Madhya Pradesh Post Independence, smost probably a page or two were dedicated to this gentleman there. Also search in local language script (is it Devanagari?), it is sometimes helpful. -- Tito Dutta  ✉  16:39, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

INCOTM
Hi, you are receiving this message because your name is listed at INCOTM/Members, where people indicate their interest in the India Project Collaboration of the Month (INCOTM).

INCOTM is restarting and you are welcome to nominate articles for collaborative improvement during July 2013. - Sitush (talk) 12:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Dale Irby for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dale Irby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dale Irby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (Tejaswi S. Naik) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Tejaswi S. Naik, Доктор прагматик!

Wikipedia editor Alcides86 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Sir good to see you after a long time. i will try and help expanding this article."

To reply, leave a comment on Alcides86's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Tejaswi S. Naik for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tejaswi S. Naik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tejaswi S. Naik until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uncletomwood (talk) 13:09, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Alirajpur tehsil) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Alirajpur tehsil.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 01:17, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 2019 India–Pakistan standoff


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2019 India–Pakistan standoff. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2019 Balakot airstrike. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2019 Balakot Airstrike. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  D Big X ray ᗙ  08:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2019 Balakot airstrike to another page 2019 India–Pakistan standoff. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.  D Big X ray ᗙ  09:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)