User talk:PrairieKid/Archive 4

ASL
Hi PrairieKid,

Thanks for the help so far on the GAR for ASL. I haven't had internet access for the past few days, but I'm going to work on the remaining issues asap. Thanks for your time. Mo-Al (talk) 00:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * That's fine. Thanks for letting me know. I was beginning to get worried. PrairieKid (talk) 00:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Changes to Washington page
Explain how fixing a dead link to Moose and removing a sentence about a specific county is unconstructive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.252.197.4 (talk) 18:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi prairie Kid
 * I saw the improvements to the article "Washington State" - It is looking a lot better all ready! Martinvl (talk) 10:45, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks. It has been a bit of a slow process. I really need to just sit down one day and just work on that article, finding refs, copy editing, etc. to get it to the point where I can at least feel comfortable nominating it. PrairieKid (talk) 15:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Burnett (New York Politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservative Party (United States) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

NJ Senate Election Article
Hey, Sorry if I made a mess on the NJ Senate election article. I was fighting with the coding since somehow, when I looked there had been what looked like an attempt to add a poll (showing the race a lot tighter) with no source given. I didn't realize this was the issue initially, fiddled with the coding, and then realized that the closer poll had no source indicated and deleted it as lacking a source. Again, my apologies if this made a mess of things. It probably doesn't help that I'm blanking on my password for my account on here.72.82.100.79 (talk) 02:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

My old account is/was Tyrenon. I come back every-so-often to fiddle with articles, but I'm (sadly) a bit lazy with logging in. It also seems that I declined to attach an email to the account (at least as I can tell), which would make recovery tricky.72.82.100.79 (talk) 02:57, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Anne Gust
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:24, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Rand Paul, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ''You are removing accurate material and replacing it with a POV/BLP violation. Please discuss this first, so that you can understand why it is an error.'' MilesMoney (talk) 23:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

A vandalism warning? Seriously. First off, I am surprised you're going against your own policy. At the top of your talk page, you say anything related to pages should STAY on those pages. Just my own interesting observation. Second, the sources say that Paul does not personally support same-sex marriage, but thinks it should be left to the states. He PERSONALLY wants it abolished but doesn't legally want it abolished. Don't change the wording because you either don't agree with him or disagree with the source. PrairieKid (talk) 23:09, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * You are edit-warring and violating BLP. If you continue, you may be blocked. I had to warn you so that nobody could later say that you didn't know any better. MilesMoney (talk) 23:15, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Senator Warren already denied running for president.
Why are you deleting it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fhkung (talk • contribs) 19:14, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Howdy-
 * Please read our rules about candidates. While Senator Warren has said she isn't considering a run, she hasn't made a definite statement. She has not said "I am not running, not considering running, and won't consider running." Few candidates admit to an interest so early (3 years) before an election. (This election has an oddly high amount.) Until she makes that statement, she remains where she is.
 * Would you mind adding that comment to Talk:United States presidential election, 2016, so it's clearer why she should be removed from the listing of potential candidates who declined? —C.Fred (talk) 19:34, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Reminder: when leaving warnings at user talk pages, like you did at User talk:Fhkung, make sure you subst the template. —C.Fred (talk) 19:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that... I am horrible about adding the subst. Thanks. PrairieKid (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ann Rivers
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ann Rivers you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- 18:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Rollback
Please read Rollback and use wisely. John Reaves 21:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for the revert on my edits to the Cory Booker page. I have this converter extension on my browser and it screwed everything up without me even realizing it! Harland Q  Pitt  00:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC)


 * That's the first time I've ever been thanked by an editor for reverting their edits. No big deal. Cheers. PrairieKid (talk) 00:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ann Rivers
The article Ann Rivers you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ann Rivers for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- 01:52, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Comcast Business Services
Sorry for the delayed reply. The article looks good and you appear to have met the criteria for the $75 award. Could you please email me your payment info? Cla68 (talk) 12:30, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, please disregard. Cla68 (talk) 07:47, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

"Wiki Loves Libraries" edit-athon in Vancouver, WA
''You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of WikiProjectOregon or WikiProject Washington. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)