User talk:Prairiefire2

In response to your feedback
Hi - Welcome back! Below the edit window is a line (just above the save button) to enter the edit summary. See WP:ES for more detail.

Ariconte (talk) 07:00, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

&#160;

Your submission at Articles for creation: Election audits has been accepted
 Election audits, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

article on election audits
Thanks for creating and maintaining the Election audits article. It covers a lot of ground, and I thought the differences among states were important enough to have a table of comparisons, based on VerifiedVoting and NCSL, which I added today. Numbersinstitute (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the addition. I hung back from including such detailed information because I didn't feel comfortable making the commitment to keep that amount of 50-state detail up-to-date. I hope you'll stick around to do that! Again, thanks. Prairiefire2 (talk) 20:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes I'll try to keep it up to date. I posted a question on Talk:Election_audits. Can you clarify that situation at all? Numbersinstitute (talk) 21:47, 1 May 2018 (UTC)