User talk:Prajakta Khairnar

Ahmednagar
Hello. Your recent edit to Ahmednagar appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Help me!
I have created an article on special pages and now I want it to be a wikipedia article. what should I do?

Please help me with...

Prajakta Khairnar (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)


 * - hi there, I assume you are referring to User:Prajakta Khairnar/Bhoopali Sudhakar Nisal? Just want to confirm before I give some unhelpful advice! Just write below and I'll see it :) Nosebagbear (talk) 17:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Yes.. right. Thank you for replying. Just now I have created and published a new wikipedia page by copying the matter from my special page. But I can't find it on search engine yet. Do I need to do anything else ? TIA Prajakta Khairnar (talk) 18:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)


 * , hi so a couple of bits.


 * Please never "copy and paste" content from one page to another, as everything has a page history for copyright. At the top of the page there's a drop-down list under "more" which has a WP:MOVE option. I've deleted and re-moved it for you.


 * New articles can't be picked up by search engines until it's been "patrolled" - an experienced reviewer checking it meets the minimum requirements. Most clear-cut cases get handled in 2 days, but some can take several weeks to be patrolled. When that's happened, the search engines will usually pick it up within a day or two. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I am new on wikipedia and was not aware of that. Thank you for help 😇 Prajakta Khairnar (talk) 04:32, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

About Bhoopali Sudhakar Nisal
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Bhoopali Sudhakar Nisal a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhoopali Sudhakar Nisal


A tag has been placed on Bhoopali Sudhakar Nisal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Daiyusha (talk) 03:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC)  You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:


 * When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. Also you haven't ref renced properly, see above, it's highly promotional, and you haven't declared your conflict of interest Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  19:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Query about news paper clippings as a reference, is unanswered
I will try to improve the article as per the guidelines given. But I did not get any information about my query about news paper clippings as a reference i.e. whether the newspaper clippings of reputed newspapers considered as a reliable source and how to use it (news of old times are not available online). Please guide. Prajakta Khairnar (talk) 09:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Where did you ask this question? The best place to ask things like this is probably the Teahouse, which is designed to help newer editors with questions. If you post something on your own user talk page, very few people will see it - I've only seen it because I watchlisted your page after answering your previous question.
 * In answer to your question, newspapers don't need to be online - if they are reliable, then just providing information on the physical copy is fine. Like a normal reference, but without a URL. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

First of all thank you for your kind support. I posted this query on the talk page of mr. Jimfbleak with reference to the speedy deletion of the article I created. In response, he posted the guidance on my talk page, but I did not find answer to this query, so I posted back. Can I request you to review my article first, after I recreate it ? So that it won't get deleted again. This time I will add those offline newspapers links too. thank you Prajakta Khairnar (talk) 14:28, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I review drafts in order of oldest first (almost always through WP:AFC) in order to be fair, so I won't be able to review yours. The Teahouse may be able to help - their hosts are excellent. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Okay!! thanks for the direction :) Prajakta Khairnar (talk) 15:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)